The COSPAR planetary protection policy for missions to Icy Worlds: A review of history, current scientific knowledge, and future directions
Open accessAbstract
Recent discoveries related to the habitability and astrobiological relevance of the outer Solar System have expanded our understanding of where and how life may have originated. As a result, the Icy Worlds of the outer Solar System have become among the highest priority targets for future spacecraft missions dedicated to astrobiology-focused and/or direct life detection objectives. This, in turn, has led to a renewed interest in planetary protection concerns and policies for the exploration of these worlds and has been a topic of discussion within the COSPAR (Committee on Space Research) Panel on Planetary Protection. This paper summarizes the results of those discussions, reviewing the current knowledge and the history of planetary protection considerations for Icy Worlds as well as suggesting ways forward. Based on those discussions, we therefore suggest to 1) Establish a new definition for Icy Worlds for Planetary Protection that captures the outer Solar System moons and dwarf planets like Pluto, but excludes more primitive bodies such as comets, centaurs, and asteroids: Icy Worlds in our Solar System are defined as all bodies with an outermost layer that is believed to be greater than 50% water ice by volume and have enough mass to assume a nearly round shape. 2) Establish indices for the lower limits of Earth life with regards to water activity (LLAw) and temperature (LLT) and apply them into all areas of the COSPAR Planetary Protection Policy. These values are currently set at 0.5 and -28°C and were originally established for defining Mars Special Regions; 3) Establish LLT as a parameter to assign categorization for Icy Worlds missions. The suggested categorization will have a 1000-year period of biological exploration, to be applied to all Icy Worlds and not just Europa and Enceladus as is currently the case. 4) Have all missions consider the possibility of impact. Transient thermal anomalies caused by impact would be acceptable so long as there is less than 10−4 probability of a single microbe reaching deeper environments where temperature is >LLT in the period of biological exploration. 5) Restructure or remove Category II* from the policy as it becomes largely redundant with this new approach, 6) Establish that any sample return from an Icy World should be Category V restricted Earth return.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many other bodies have been confirmed to be rich in water ice resources, including the Jovian satellites Europa, Ganymede, and Callisto, as well as the Saturnian satellites Enceladus and Titan.
“Many other bodies have also been confirmed to be rich in water ice resources, including the Jovian satellites Europa, Ganymede, and Callisto, as well as the Saturnian satellites Enceladus and Titan. 88”
From Energy system and resource utilization in space: A state-of-the-art review (2024) · cites this paper as [88]
Section 3, “Icy world definition and background,” lists Europa, Ganymede, Callisto, Enceladus, and Titan as Icy Worlds with icy crusts. Table 1 refers to a greater-than-50% water-ice criterion for an Icy World. These passages support describing the moons as water-ice-rich, but do not establish confirmed quantities of water ice available as resources. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 88 · Cited by 11
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- COSPAR, 2020. COSPAR Policy on Planetary Protection, 208. Space Research Today, pp. 10-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srt.2020.07.009. · DOI
- COSPAR, 2021. COSPAR Policy on Planetary Protection, 211. Space Research Today, pp. 9-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srt.2021.07.010. · DOI
- Coustenis, A., Kminek, G., Hedman, N., 2019a. The challenge of planetary protection. ROOM. Space J. Asgardia 2 (20), 44-48. https://room.eu.com/article/the-chall enge-of-planetary-protection.
- Coustenis, A., 2021. The atmosphere of Titan. In: Read, P. (Ed.), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Planetary Science. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/ 10.1093/acrefore/9780190647926.013.120. · DOI
- Grasset, O., Bunce, E., Coustenis, A., et al., 2013. Planetary protection requirements at Ganymede. Astrobiology. 13 (10), 991-1004.
- Iess, L., Jacobson, R.A., Ducci, M., et al., 2012. The tides of Titan. Science (1979) 337 (6093), 457-459.
- Kminek, G., Hipken, V., Anesio, A.M., et al., 2015. In: Meeting Report: COSPAR Panel on Planetary Protection Colloquium. Bern, Switzerland, 195. Space Research Today. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srt.2016.03.013. September 2015. · DOI
- Montross, S., Skidmore, M., Christner, B., et al., 2014. Debris-rich basal ice as a microbial habitat. Taylor Glacier, Antarctica. Geomicrobiol. J. 31 (1), 76-81. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/01490451.2013.811316. · DOI
- National Research Council, 1978. Recommendations On Quarantine Policy For Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune, and Titan. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.17226/20034. · DOI
- National Research Council, 2000. Preventing the Forward Contamination of Europa. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.17226/9895. · DOI
- National Research Council, 2007. Exploring Organic Environments in the Solar System. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.17226/11860. · DOI
- National Research Council, 2012. Assessment of Planetary Protection Requirements for Spacecraft Missions to Icy Solar System Bodies. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.17226/13401. · DOI
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, 2015. Review of the MEPAG Report on Mars Special Regions. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.17226/21816. · DOI
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, 2018. Review and Assessment of Planetary Protection Policy Development Processes. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.17226/25172. · DOI
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, 2000. Letter Report: Scientific Assessment of Options for the Disposition of the Galileo Spacecraft. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.17226/9896. · DOI
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, 2020. Assessment of the Report of NASA's Planetary Protection Independent Review Board. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.17226/25773. · DOI
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, 2023. Origins, Worlds, Life: A Decadal Strategy for Planetary Science and Astrobiology 2023-2032. https://doi. org/10.17226/26522. · DOI
- Rummel, J.D., Raulin, F., Ehrenfreund, P., 2010. COSPAR Workshop on Planetary Protection For Titan and Ganymede, Pasadena, California, USA. COSPAR, Paris, p.
- Authors
- Doran, P. T., Hayes, A., Grasset, O., Coustenis, A., Prieto-Ballesteros, O., Hedman, N., Al Shehhi, O., Ammannito, E., Fujimoto, M., Groen, F., Moores, J. E., Mustin, C., Olsson-Francis, K., Peng, J., Praveenkumar, K., Rettberg, P., Sinibaldi, S., Ilyin, V., Raulin, F., Suzuki, Y., Xu, K., Whyte, L. G., Zaitsev, M., Buffo, J., Kminek, G., & Schmidt, B.
- Affiliations
- Louisiana State University (US)
- Cornell University (US)
- Nantes Université (FR)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs (AT)
- Agenzia Spaziale Italiana (IT)
- Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JP)
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration (US)
- York University (CA)
- Centre National d'Études Spatiales (FR)
- China National Space Administration (CN)
- Indian Space Research Organisation (IN)
- Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE)
- European Space Agency (FR)
- Russian Academy of Sciences (RU)
- The University of Tokyo (JP)
- China Academy of Space Technology (CN)
- McGill University (CA)
- Dartmouth College (US)
- Corresponding author
- Doran, P.T.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Life Sciences in Space Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-05
- Volume
- 41
- Pages
- 86-99
- ISSN
- 2214-5524 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4391656891
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 88
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 2.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Life Sciences in Space Research (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- elib (German Aerospace Center) (acceptedVersion)
- Open Research Online (The Open University) (acceptedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Civil War Book Review (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Louisiana State University
- Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales
- Agencia Estatal de Investigación (AEI//10.13039/501100011033/, 501100011033, 10.13039/501100011033, 13039, .13039/501100011033, 10.13039, PID2019)
- Research England
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
- Keywords
- planetary protection, icy worlds, Europa, Enceladus, Pluto, astrobiology, habitability, water activity, impact risk, sample return, microbial contamination
- MeSH terms
- Extraterrestrial Environment, Space Flight, Solar System, Planets, Spacecraft, Exobiology, History, 20th Century
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review