Evolution of sensory aroma attributes from coffee beans to brewed coffee
Open accessAbstract
This study investigated the impact of degree of roasting, grinding, and brewing on the evolution of coffee aroma in green coffee beans from Ethiopia, Hawaii, and El Salvador. Using a highly-trained descriptive panel, 15 aromatic sensory attributes were identified and quantified in green beans, roasted beans (light, medium, and dark), ground coffee, and brewed coffee. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and principal components analysis (PCA) were done separately for each preparation stage/step. The ANOVA showed that green beans had low coffee-related characteristics and were high in beany, green, musty/earthy, and sour aromatics, all of which carried through to the final brews. In general, the light roast was perceived to be sweeter in all stages and the darker roasts attained higher intensity of the typical âcoffeeâ attributes with which coffee consumers might like (coffee, roasted, burnt/acrid, and ashy/sooty). The aroma profiles generated were more influenced by the preparation stages and degrees of roasting than the coffee varieties.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The degree of roasting and preparation process contributed to aroma profiles rather than the coffee variety.
“According to Bhumiratana et al. [10], the degree of roasting and preparation process contributed to aroma profiles rather than the coffee variety.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 16 · Cited by 257
- Authors
- Bhumiratana, N., Adhikari, K., & Chambers, E.
- Affiliations
- Kansas State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Adhikari, Koushik
- Venue
- LWT - Food Science and Technology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-12
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2185-2192
- ISSN
- 0023-6438 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2001259415
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 3.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- LWT (publishedVersion)
- K-State Research Exchange (Kansas State University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Chemistry and Fat Analysis
- Keywords
- coffee aroma, sensory properties, coffee roasting, coffee grinding, coffee brewing, green coffee beans, roasted coffee, coffee varieties, Ethiopian coffee
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review