Cited by 257Coffee research and impactsSensory Analysis and Statistical MethodsFood Chemistry and Fat Analysis

Evolution of sensory aroma attributes from coffee beans to brewed coffee

Open access
Bhumiratana, Natnicha, Adhikari, Koushik, Chambers, Edgar·2011·LWT - Food Science and Technology

Abstract

This study investigated the impact of degree of roasting, grinding, and brewing on the evolution of coffee aroma in green coffee beans from Ethiopia, Hawaii, and El Salvador. Using a highly-trained descriptive panel, 15 aromatic sensory attributes were identified and quantified in green beans, roasted beans (light, medium, and dark), ground coffee, and brewed coffee. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and principal components analysis (PCA) were done separately for each preparation stage/step. The ANOVA showed that green beans had low coffee-related characteristics and were high in beany, green, musty/earthy, and sour aromatics, all of which carried through to the final brews. In general, the light roast was perceived to be sweeter in all stages and the darker roasts attained higher intensity of the typical ‘coffee’ attributes with which coffee consumers might like (coffee, roasted, burnt/acrid, and ashy/sooty). The aroma profiles generated were more influenced by the preparation stages and degrees of roasting than the coffee varieties.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.lwt.2011.07.001

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 16 · Cited by 257

Authors
Bhumiratana, N., Adhikari, K., & Chambers, E.
Affiliations
Kansas State University (US)
Corresponding author
Adhikari, Koushik
Venue
LWT - Food Science and Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-12
Volume
44
Issue
10
Pages
2185-2192
ISSN
0023-6438 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2001259415
Cited by
257
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • LWT (publishedVersion)
  • K-State Research Exchange (Kansas State University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Chemistry and Fat Analysis
Keywords
coffee aroma, sensory properties, coffee roasting, coffee grinding, coffee brewing, green coffee beans, roasted coffee, coffee varieties, Ethiopian coffee

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review