Antioxidant, antimicrobial and emulsification properties of exopolysaccharides from lactic acid bacteria of bovine milk: Insights from biochemical and genomic analysis
Open accessAbstract
Exopolysaccharides (EPSs) are versatile organic thickeners derived from microbes, offering beneficial bioactive properties. This study focused on isolating new bacterial strains from bovine milk capable of EPS biosynthesis. Out of 63 isolates, four strains, Lactiplantibacillus sp. ME2b, Lactococcus sp. ME7, Lacticaseibacillus sp. ME17, and Lactobacillus sp. ME27a, exhibited high EPS production, ranging from 0.98 g/L to 2.68 g/L. EPS extracted from these strains had higher carbohydrate and lower protein contents. The EPS extracts showed strong antioxidant activity, demonstrated by DPPH (∼82–89%) and hydroxyl radical scavenging (∼88–91%), and reducing power capacity (3.28–3.65). They also displayed potent antimicrobial activity against Gram-negative and Gram-positive pathogens, including Bacillus cereus, Salmonella typhi, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, with stronger inhibition against Gram-positive strains. Additionally, the EPS showed emulsification activity with ME17 showing the highest emulsification index (60%). The EPS extracts exhibited significant anti-inflammatory effects (∼81–84%). Whole genome sequencing of the prominent strain ME2b revealed a 3,281,666 kb genome carrying 3,101 coding sequences including EPS biosynthesis-related genes epsABCDE, wxz, wzy, and glycosyltransferases. These findings underscore significant potential of the EPS in diverse applications, particularly in food and biotechnology sectors, with future efforts a…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Measuring the zone of inhibition allows assessment of the relative potency of a test compound against a specific microorganism.
“By measuring the resulting zone of inhibition (Fig. 1), which represents the area where microbial growth is prevented or inhibited by the agent, researchers can assess the relative potency of the test compound against the specific microorganism under investigation [28].”
From Methods for screening and evaluation of antimicrobial activity: A review of protocols, advantages, and limitations (2024) · cites this paper as [28]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 61 · Cited by 69
- Authors
- Tarannum, N., Hossain, T. J., Ali, F., Das, T., Dhar, K., & Nafiz, I. H.
- Affiliations
- University of Chittagong (BD)
- Corresponding author
- Hossain, Tanim Jabid
- Ali, Ferdausi
- Venue
- LWT
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-08
- Volume
- 186
- Pages
- 115263
- ISSN
- 0023-6438 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4386480584
- Cited by
- 69
- References
- 61
- Citations by year
- 2026: 25 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 17
- FWCI
- 9.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- LWT (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- University of Chittagong
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Polysaccharides Composition and Applications
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Proteins in Food Systems
- Keywords
- exopolysaccharides, lactic acid bacteria, cow's milk, antioxidant activity, antimicrobial activity, emulsification, anti-inflammatory activity, Lactiplantibacillus, Lactococcus, Lacticaseibacillus, Lactobacillus, whole genome sequencing, food biopolymers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review