Sex-specific regulation of aging and apoptosis
Abstract
Genetic analysis of Drosophila, mice and humans indicates that gene alleles, mutations and transgenes that affect life span tend to do so differently depending on the sex of the organism. The likely reason for this is that the sexes are different genotypes (e.g., X/X vs. X/Y) and face quite different environments: e.g., to reproduce, males have to mate with females while females have to mate with males. Genes are subject to different genetic interactions and different gene-by-environment effects in male vs. female. The consequence is that through evolution certain genes are differently selected and optimized for each sex. Both the mitochondrial genome and the X chromosome are asymmetrically inherited in Drosophila and mammals; through evolution these genes spend relatively more time under selection in females and are therefore expected to be better optimized for function in the female than in the male. Consistent with this the Drosophila X chromosome has been found to be a hotspot for sexually antagonistic fitness variation. Old Drosophila and old mammals exhibit apoptosis-an observation consistent with the idea that the mitochondria are less functional during aging due to maternal-only inheritance. One feature of aging that is common to Drosophila and mammals is that females tend to live longer than males, and this may be due in part to sub-optimal mitochondrial function in males. The data support the conclusion that a significant part of the aging phenotype is due to antagonistic pleiotropy of gene function between the sexes. Liberal application of Occam's razor yields a molecular model for the co-regulation of sex, apoptosis and life span based on the on/off status of a single gene: Sxl in Drosophila melanogaster and Xist in humans. Aging may simply represent an ancient and conserved mechanism by which genes re-assort.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 143 · Cited by 125
- Authors
- Tower, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Southern California (US)
- Corresponding author
- Tower, John
- ORCID
- Tower, John
- Venue
- Mechanisms of Ageing and Development
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-09
- Volume
- 127
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 705-718
- ISSN
- 0047-6374 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4211228471
- Cited by
- 125
- References
- 143
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 1.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Mechanisms of Ageing and Development (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
- Ellison Medical Foundation
- National Institutes of Health (5r01ag011644-10)
- National Institute on Aging (AG11833, AG11644, R01AG011833)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Keywords
- sex differences in aging, apoptosis, lifespan, sexually antagonistic selection, antagonistic pleiotropy, mitochondrial inheritance, X chromosome, Sxl, XIST, sex-specific gene regulation, Drosophila melanogaster, sex-biased selection
- MeSH terms
- Aging, Animals, Cell Nucleus, Female, Humans, Longevity, Male, Mitochondria, Sex Characteristics, Species Specificity, X Chromosome, Apoptosis, Oxidative Stress, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Quantitative Trait Loci, Chromosomes, Human, X
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review