Cited by 43Epigenetics and DNA MethylationGenetic Syndromes and ImprintingGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

Progressive age-dependent DNA methylation changes start before adulthood in mouse tissues

Takasugi, Masaki·2011·Mechanisms of Ageing and Development

Abstract

Changes in DNA methylation during aging have implications for various age-related diseases. While the deleterious effects of age-dependent methylation changes after adulthood have attracted the attention of researchers, the relationship between those changes and changes that occur before adulthood have not been focused on. In this study, dozens of CpG sites whose methylation status changed after adulthood were identified in the mouse muscle, brain, and liver, by analysis of the methylation status of 316 CpG sites located within -7 to 3 kb of the transcription start sites (TSS-flanking regions) of 350 genes. Although the majority of the methylation changes were tissue-specific, two characteristics were observed in the methylation changes of each tissue. First, most DNA methylation changes after adulthood were preceded by prominent and same-direction DNA methylation changes before adulthood, and second, the expression levels of genes near progressively methylated and demethylated CpG sites were already significantly low and high, respectively, in young mice. The latter finding was also confirmed by analyzing recently published data of genome-wide age-dependent methylation changes. These results suggest that the DNA methylation status consistently move toward development/maturation throughout lifespan, and the tissue-dependent epigenetic or transcriptional status underlies the methylation changes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mad.2010.12.003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 40 · Cited by 43

Authors
Takasugi, M.
Affiliations
The University of Tokyo (JP)
Corresponding author
Takasugi, Masaki
Venue
Mechanisms of Ageing and Development
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-01
Volume
132
Issue
1-2
Pages
65-71
ISSN
0047-6374 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2046964473
Cited by
43
References
40
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 9
FWCI
2.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Mechanisms of Ageing and Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Japan Student Services Organization
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
DNA methylation, aging, CpG sites, tissue-specific methylation, developmental maturation, gene expression, muscle, brain, liver, mice, epigenetic regulation
MeSH terms
Aging, Animals, Brain, Female, Liver, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Muscles, Tissue Distribution, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, CpG Islands, DNA Methylation, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Epigenesis, Genetic, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review