Progressive age-dependent DNA methylation changes start before adulthood in mouse tissues
Abstract
Changes in DNA methylation during aging have implications for various age-related diseases. While the deleterious effects of age-dependent methylation changes after adulthood have attracted the attention of researchers, the relationship between those changes and changes that occur before adulthood have not been focused on. In this study, dozens of CpG sites whose methylation status changed after adulthood were identified in the mouse muscle, brain, and liver, by analysis of the methylation status of 316 CpG sites located within -7 to 3 kb of the transcription start sites (TSS-flanking regions) of 350 genes. Although the majority of the methylation changes were tissue-specific, two characteristics were observed in the methylation changes of each tissue. First, most DNA methylation changes after adulthood were preceded by prominent and same-direction DNA methylation changes before adulthood, and second, the expression levels of genes near progressively methylated and demethylated CpG sites were already significantly low and high, respectively, in young mice. The latter finding was also confirmed by analyzing recently published data of genome-wide age-dependent methylation changes. These results suggest that the DNA methylation status consistently move toward development/maturation throughout lifespan, and the tissue-dependent epigenetic or transcriptional status underlies the methylation changes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Dynamic changes in DNA methylation occur across tissues during aging in humans, nonhuman primates, and mice.
“it is shown that dynamic changes in DNA methylation occur across tissues during aging in humans10, nonhuman primates11, and mice12,13.”
From Integrated analysis of behavioral, epigenetic, and gut microbiome analyses in AppNL-G-F, AppNL-F, and wild type mice (2021) · cites this paper as [13]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 40 · Cited by 43
- Authors
- Takasugi, M.
- Affiliations
- The University of Tokyo (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Takasugi, Masaki
- ORCID
- Takasugi, Masaki
- Venue
- Mechanisms of Ageing and Development
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-01
- Volume
- 132
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 65-71
- ISSN
- 0047-6374 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2046964473
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 2.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Mechanisms of Ageing and Development (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Japan Student Services Organization
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Keywords
- DNA methylation, aging, CpG sites, tissue-specific methylation, developmental maturation, gene expression, muscle, brain, liver, mice, epigenetic regulation
- MeSH terms
- Aging, Animals, Brain, Female, Liver, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Muscles, Tissue Distribution, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, CpG Islands, DNA Methylation, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Epigenesis, Genetic, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review