Cited by 154Retinal Diseases and TreatmentsAntioxidant Activity and Oxidative StressGenomics, phytochemicals, and oxidative stress

How does the macula protect itself from oxidative stress?

Open access
Handa, James T.·2012·Molecular Aspects of Medicine

Abstract

Oxidative stress has been hypothesized to contribute to the development of age-related macular degeneration (AMD), the most common cause of blindness in the United States. At present, there is no treatment for early disease. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) play a physiological role in the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), a key cell type in this disease, but with excessive ROS, oxidative damage or excessive innate immune system activation can result. The RPE has developed a robust antioxidant system driven by the transcription factor Nrf2. Impaired Nrf2 signaling can lead to oxidative damage or activate the innate immune response, both of which can lead to RPE apoptosis, a defining change in AMD. Several mouse models simulating environmental stressors or targeting specific antioxidant enzymes such as superoxide dismutase or Nrf2, have simulated some of the features of AMD. While ROS are short-lived, oxidatively damaged molecules termed oxidation specific epitopes (OSEs), can be long-lived and a source of chronic stress that activates the innate immune system through pattern recognition receptors (PRRs). The macula accumulates a number of OSEs including carboxyethylpyrrole, malondialdehyde, 4-hydroxynonenal, and advanced glycation endproducts, as well as their respective neutralizing PRRs. Excessive accumulation of OSEs results in pathologic immune activation. For example, mice immunized with the carboxyethylpyrrole develop cardinal features of AMD. Regulating ROS in the RPE by modulating antioxidant systems or neutralizing OSEs through an appropriate innate immune response are potential modalities to treat or prevent early AMD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mam.2012.03.006

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dysfunction of phagocytosis, lysosomal degradation, and waste removal by the RPE can lead to severe retinopathies, including age-related macular degeneration.

    “Dysfunction of such processes as phagocytosis, lysosomal degradation, and removal of waste products by the RPE can lead to severe retinopathies, including age-related macular degeneration (AMD).”

    From Chemistry of the Retinoid (Visual) Cycle (2014) · cites this paper as [273]

    Section 9.4 links compromised lysosomal/autophagic protein degradation to early AMD-like changes in mice, and Section 13 proposes that inadequate removal of oxidatively damaged molecules contributes to RPE injury and drusen formation. Section 2 identifies phagocytosis as an essential RPE function, but the paper does not establish that dysfunctional RPE phagocytosis causes AMD or the broader category of severe retinopathies. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 182 · Cited by 154

Authors
Handa, J. T.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Handa, James T.
Venue
Molecular Aspects of Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-08
Volume
33
Issue
4
Pages
418-435
ISSN
0098-2997 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2039002855
Cited by
154
References
182
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Aspects of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Edward N. and Della L. Thome Memorial Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Eye Institute (EY14005, R01EY014005, EY019904, R01EY019904)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics, phytochemicals, and oxidative stress
Keywords
age-related macular degeneration, oxidative stress, retinal pigment epithelium, reactive oxygen species, Nrf2 signaling, antioxidant defense, oxidation-specific epitopes, innate immune activation, pattern recognition receptors, superoxide dismutase, advanced glycation end products, macula
MeSH terms
Aging, Animals, Epitopes, Disease Models, Animal, Humans, Immunity, Innate, Macula Lutea, Macular Degeneration, Oxidation-Reduction, Risk Factors, Signal Transduction, Reactive Oxygen Species, Oxidative Stress, NF-E2-Related Factor 2, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review