Tissue distribution and kinetics of dissolved and nanoparticulate silver in Iceland scallop (Chlamys islandica)
Abstract
The fast expansion of the global nanotechnology market entails a higher environmental and human exposure to nanomaterials. Silver nanoparticles (AgNP) are used for their antibacterial properties; however, their environmental fate is yet poorly understood. Iceland scallops (Chlamys islandica) were exposed for 12 h to three different silver forms, dissolved Ag(I) (Agdiss), small (S-NP, Ø = 10-20 nm) and large AgNP (L-NP, Ø = 70-80 nm), labeled with (110m)Ag, and bioaccumulation kinetics and tissue distribution using in vivo gamma counting and whole-body autoradiography were determined. All Ag forms were readily and rapidly accumulated. Elimination process was also fast and bi-exponential, with mean biological half-life ranging from 1.4 to 4.3 days and from 17 to 50 days for fast and slow compartments, respectively. Most of the radioactivity concentrated in the hepatopancreas. Agdiss and S-NP tissue distributions were similar indicating a rapid dissolution of the latter in the tissues, contrarily to L-NP which appeared to form long lasting aggregates in the digestive system. Estimated steady-state bioconcentration factors (BCF), ranging between 2700 and 3800 ml g(-1) for dissolved and particulate silver forms, showed that C. islandica can accumulate significant quantities of Ag in a short time followed by an efficient depuration process.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In contrast, scallops exposed to radiolabelled silver nanoparticles accumulated them in the hepatopancreas.
“These results are in contrast to a similar study, where the scallops were exposed to radiolabelled silver nanoparticles (instead of plastic nanoplastics), which accumulated in the hepatopancreas.157”
From The fate of plastic in the ocean environment – a minireview (2021) · cites this paper as [157]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 43 · Cited by 42
- Authors
- Al-Sid-Cheikh, M., Rouleau, C., & Pelletier, E.
- Affiliations
- Université du Québec à Rimouski (CA)
- Fisheries and Oceans Canada (CA)
- ORCID
- Al-Sid-Cheikh, Maya
- Venue
- Marine Environmental Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-05
- Volume
- 86
- Pages
- 21-28
- ISSN
- 0141-1136 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2021594672
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 3.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Marine Environmental Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Canada Research Chairs
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
- Keywords
- silver nanoparticles, dissolved silver, Chlamys islandica, bioaccumulation kinetics, tissue distribution, silver dissolution, nanoparticle aggregation, biological half-life, bioconcentration factor, depuration, hepatopancreas, gamma counting, whole-body autoradiography
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Autoradiography, Environmental Pollutants, Iceland, Kinetics, Radioisotopes, Silver, Time Factors, Tissue Distribution, Pectinidae, Metal Nanoparticles
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review