Cited by 42Environmental Toxicology and EcotoxicologyNanoparticles: synthesis and applicationsMicroplastics and Plastic Pollution

Tissue distribution and kinetics of dissolved and nanoparticulate silver in Iceland scallop (Chlamys islandica)

Al-Sid-Cheikh, Maya, Rouleau, Claude, Pelletier, Emilien·2013·Marine Environmental Research

Abstract

The fast expansion of the global nanotechnology market entails a higher environmental and human exposure to nanomaterials. Silver nanoparticles (AgNP) are used for their antibacterial properties; however, their environmental fate is yet poorly understood. Iceland scallops (Chlamys islandica) were exposed for 12 h to three different silver forms, dissolved Ag(I) (Agdiss), small (S-NP, Ø = 10-20 nm) and large AgNP (L-NP, Ø = 70-80 nm), labeled with (110m)Ag, and bioaccumulation kinetics and tissue distribution using in vivo gamma counting and whole-body autoradiography were determined. All Ag forms were readily and rapidly accumulated. Elimination process was also fast and bi-exponential, with mean biological half-life ranging from 1.4 to 4.3 days and from 17 to 50 days for fast and slow compartments, respectively. Most of the radioactivity concentrated in the hepatopancreas. Agdiss and S-NP tissue distributions were similar indicating a rapid dissolution of the latter in the tissues, contrarily to L-NP which appeared to form long lasting aggregates in the digestive system. Estimated steady-state bioconcentration factors (BCF), ranging between 2700 and 3800 ml g(-1) for dissolved and particulate silver forms, showed that C. islandica can accumulate significant quantities of Ag in a short time followed by an efficient depuration process.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.marenvres.2013.02.003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In contrast, scallops exposed to radiolabelled silver nanoparticles accumulated them in the hepatopancreas.

    “These results are in contrast to a similar study, where the scallops were exposed to radiolabelled silver nanoparticles (instead of plastic nanoplastics), which accumulated in the hepatopancreas.157”

    From The fate of plastic in the ocean environment – a minireview (2021) · cites this paper as [157]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 43 · Cited by 42

Authors
Al-Sid-Cheikh, M., Rouleau, C., & Pelletier, E.
Affiliations
  • Université du Québec à Rimouski (CA)
  • Fisheries and Oceans Canada (CA)
Venue
Marine Environmental Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-05
Volume
86
Pages
21-28
ISSN
0141-1136 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2021594672
Cited by
42
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Marine Environmental Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canada Research Chairs
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
Keywords
silver nanoparticles, dissolved silver, Chlamys islandica, bioaccumulation kinetics, tissue distribution, silver dissolution, nanoparticle aggregation, biological half-life, bioconcentration factor, depuration, hepatopancreas, gamma counting, whole-body autoradiography
MeSH terms
Animals, Autoradiography, Environmental Pollutants, Iceland, Kinetics, Radioisotopes, Silver, Time Factors, Tissue Distribution, Pectinidae, Metal Nanoparticles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review