Cited by 106Marine and fisheries researchFish Ecology and Management StudiesIchthyology and Marine Biology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Tuna longline catch rates in the Indian Ocean: Did industrial fishing result in a 90% rapid decline in the abundance of large predatory species?

Polacheck, Tom·2006·Marine Policy

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.marpol.2005.06.016

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 19 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Nishida, 1991, On the fluctuation of yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) resources in the Indian ocean, Bulletin of the Japanese Society of Fisheries Oceanography, 55, 339
  2. Suzuki, 2000, A note on the stock assessments results of the fourth ICCAT billfish workshop held in Miami, Florida, July 18–28, 2000, International Commission for Conservation of Atlantic Tunas, Collective Volume of Scientific Papers, 52, 1522
  3. Foremanm TJ. Synopsis of biological data on the albacore tuna, Thunnus alagunga (Bonnaterre, 1788) in the Pacific Ocean. In: Bayliff WH, editor. Synopses of Biologial Data on Eight Species of Scombrids. Inter-America Tropical Tuna Commission Special Report No. 2: 1980. pp. 17–70.
  4. Uozumi, 1996, The historical trend of standardized CPUE for albacore caught by Japanese longline fishery in the Atlantic Ocean, International Commission for Conservation of Atlantic Tunas, Collective Volume of Scientific Papers, XLIII, 261
  5. Yanez, 1979, Analyses des prises par unite d’effort (pue) du yellowfin de la pêcherie palangrière atlantique. Relations avec les pue de pêcherie de surface, International Commission for Conservation of Atlantic Tunas, Collective Volume of Scientific Papers, VIII, 67
  6. Fonteneau, 1995, Status of interactions of Pacific tuna fisheries, FAO Technical Paper, 365, 84
  7. Au, 1986, Interpretation of longline hook rates, International Commission for Conservation of Atlantic Tunas, Collective Volume of Scientific Papers, XXV, 377
  8. Polacheck, 1989, Yellowfin tuna, Thunnus albacares, catch rates in the western Pacific, Fishery Bulletin, 87, 123
  9. Bruce, 2003, Fish-free sea, Orange County Weekly, 9

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 106

Metadata

Authors
Polacheck, T.
Corresponding author
Polacheck, Tom
Venue
Marine Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-09
Volume
30
Issue
5
Pages
470-482
ISSN
0308-597X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2028276073
Cited by
106
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
10.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Marine Policy (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Marine and fisheries research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ichthyology and Marine Biology
Keywords
tuna longline fishing, catch rates, billfish, Indian Ocean fisheries, sustainable fisheries, fisheries management policy, marine reserves, peer review, scientific controversy, media coverage of science, fish stock status

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review