Fisheries and coastal governance as a wicked problem
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Two-Eyed Seeing offers a legitimate, decolonial approach for working on wicked fisheries problems or other aquatic environmental challenges where singular solutions are near impossibilities.
“Two-Eyed Seeing offers a legitimate, decolonial approach for working on "wicked" fisheries problems or other aquatic environmental challenges where singular solutions are near impossibilities, and emphasis must instead be placed on engaging in "interactive communication and learning among stakeholders, where norms and values are played out and where different ethics, ideologies, and epistemologies are active" (Jentoft & Chuenpagdee, 2009).”
From “Two‐Eyed Seeing”: An Indigenous framework to transform fisheries research and management (2021) · cites this paper as Jentoft & Chuenpagdee, 2009
Cites
Dilemmas in a general theory of planning
Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973) · Policy Sciences · doi:10.1007/bf01405730 · Cited by 16,338 · see citing works
Problem-solving through international environmental agreements: the issue of regime effectiveness
Hisschemöller, M., & Gupta, J. (1999) · International Political Science Review · doi:10.1177/0192512199202003 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
“Two‐Eyed Seeing”: An Indigenous framework to transform fisheries research and management
Reid, A. J., Eckert, L. E., Lane, J., Young, N., Hinch, S. G., Darimont, C. T., Cooke, S. J., Ban, N. C., & Marshall, A. (2021) · Fish and Fisheries · doi:10.1111/faf.12516 · Cited by 652 · see citing works
“…singular solutions are near impossibilities, and emphasis must instead be placed on engaging in “interactive communication and learning among stakeholders, where norms and values are played out and where different ethics, ideologies, and epistemologies are active” (Jentoft & Chuenpagdee, 2009).”
Background
- Authors
- Jentoft, S., & Chuenpagdee, R.
- Affiliations
- UiT The Arctic University of Norway (NO)
- Memorial University of Newfoundland (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Jentoft, Svein
- Venue
- Marine Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-07
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 553-560
- ISSN
- 0308-597X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2070560113
- Cited by
- 670
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 49 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 66 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 33
- FWCI
- 76.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Marine Policy (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Coastal and Marine Management
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Complex Systems and Decision Making
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
- Keywords
- wicked problems, fisheries governance, coastal governance, governability, stakeholder engagement, deliberative governance, collective judgment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
