CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 7

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Resilience and adaptation: Galician canning fish industry evolution

Fernández-González, Raquel, Pérez-Vas, Raisa, Pérez-Pérez, Marcos, Pereira, Zita Graça Teixeira, Puime-Guillén, Félix, Ricoy-Casas, Rosa María·2024·Marine Policy
DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2024.106087
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.marpol.2024.106087

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. FAO, Canning of fish and seafood, in: A Complete Course in Canning and Related Processes, Elsevier, 2016: pp. 231–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-85709-679-1.00006-4. · DOI
  2. Vanhonacker, 2011, Does fish origin matter to European consumers?, Br. Food J., 113, 535, 10.1108/00070701111124005 · DOI
  3. Mata, 2020, Simple PCR-RFLP detection method for genus- and species-authentication of four types of tuna used in canned tuna industry, Food Control, 108, 10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.106842 · DOI
  4. Almeida, 2015, Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of a Canned Sardine Product from Portugal, J. Ind. Ecol., 19, 10.1111/jiec.12219 · DOI
  5. Karaca, 2022, Canned fish products: Current issues and future perspectives, Med J. Nutr. Metab., 15, 575
  6. Krešić, 2017, Consumption of canned oily fish as a source of fatty acids, Riv. Ital. Delle Sostanz-.-. Grasse, 94, 239
  7. FAO, El estado mundial de la pesca y la acuicultura 2020. La sostenibilidad en acción, FAO, Rome, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.01.032%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2012.02.007%0Ahttp://www.fao.org/publications/es. · DOI
  8. Bell, 2019, Realising the food security benefits of canned fish for Pacific Island countries, Mar. Policy, 100, 183, 10.1016/j.marpol.2018.10.034 · DOI
  9. Usydus, 2008, Food of marine origin: Between benefits and potential risks. Part I. Canned fish on the Polish market, Food Chem., 111, 556, 10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.04.018 · DOI
  10. Vázquez-Rowe, 2014, Life cycle assessment of European pilchard (Sardina pilchardus) consumption. A case study for Galicia (NW Spain), Sci. Total Environ., 475, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.12.099 · DOI
  11. Fernández-González, 2021, An analysis of production factors for Galician-farmed turbot: From boom to stagnation, Aquac. Econ. Manag., 25, 10.1080/13657305.2020.1840659 · DOI
  12. García-del-Hoyo, 2017, A demand analysis of the Spanish canned tuna market, Mar. Policy, 86, 127, 10.1016/j.marpol.2017.09.014 · DOI
  13. Cortés, 2021, Multi-product strategy to enhance the environmental profile of the canning industry towards circular economy, Sci. Total Environ., 791, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148249 · DOI · Paper page
  14. García-del-Hoyo, 2021, Granger causality between the canning sector and the Spanish tuna fleet: Evidence from the Toda-Yamamoto approach, Mar. Policy, 132, 10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104701 · DOI
  15. Hospido, 2006, Environmental assessment of canned tuna manufacture with a life-cycle perspective, Resour. Conserv Recycl, 47, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2005.10.003 · DOI
  16. Laso, 2018, Life cycle assessment of European anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus) landed by purse seine vessels in northern Spain, Int J. Life Cycle Assess., 23, 10.1007/s11367-017-1318-7 · DOI
  17. Cortés, 2021, Multi-product strategy to enhance the environmental profile of the canning industry towards circular economy, Sci. Total Environ., 791, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148249 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Ruiz-Salmón, 2021, Life cycle assessment of fish and seafood processed products – A review of methodologies and new challenges, Sci. Total Environ., 761, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144094 · DOI
  19. Almeida, 2021, Packaging environmental impact on seafood supply chains: a review of life cycle assessment studies, J. Ind. Ecol.
  20. Iribarren, 2010, Life Cycle Assessment of fresh and canned mussel processing and consumption in Galicia (NW Spain), Resour. Conserv Recycl, 55, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.08.001 · DOI
  21. Iribarren, 2010, Carbon footprint of canned mussels from a business-to-consumer approach. A starting point for mussel processors and policy makers, Environ. Sci. Policy, 13, 10.1016/j.envsci.2010.05.003 · DOI
  22. Szynaka, 2022, Fishers, Let Us Talk: Validating Métiers in a Multi-Gear Coastal Fishing Fleet, Fishes, 7, 174, 10.3390/fishes7040174 · DOI
  23. Varela-Vázquez, 2021, Aprendizaje institucional y formación de políticas científico-tecnológicas y de innovación en Galicia: un enfoque histórico, 1981-2020, Invest. De. Hist. Econ. ómica, 10.33231/j.ihe.2021.02.001 · DOI
  24. Carmona, 2022, Changes in the Spanish fish-canning industry since Spain’s entry to the European Union, Ocean Coast Manag, 216, 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105972 · DOI
  25. L. Amigo-Dobaño, M.D. Garza-Gil, M. Varela-Lafuente, Processing Of Marine Products: Sustainability, Competitiveness And Financial Viability Of The Canned Food Industry In Spain, International Business & Economics Research Journal (IBER) 7 (2011). https://doi.org/10.19030/iber.v7i9.3287. · DOI
  26. Fernández-González, 2021, Real options for a small company in a context of market concentration: A case study of investment in a turbot farming plant in Spain, Mar. Policy, 134, 10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104828 · DOI
  27. Cavallo, 2021, Is existing legislation supporting socially acceptable aquaculture in the European Union? A transversal analysis of France, Italy and Spain, Rev. Aquac., 13, 1683, 10.1111/raq.12540 · DOI
  28. Chen, 2011, Asymmetrical return on equity mean reversion and catering, J. Bank Financ, 35, 471, 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.09.009 · DOI
  29. Kurniawan, 2021, Analysis of the Effect of Return on Asset, Debt To Equity Ratio, and Total Asset Turnover on Share Return, J. Ind. Eng. Manag. Res., 2, 2722
  30. Fernández-González, 2022, COVID-19 and the Spanish Celtic Sea fishery: An economic analysis, Mar. Policy, 143, 10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105204 · DOI
  31. García-del-Hoyo, 2021, Granger causality between the canning sector and the Spanish tuna fleet: Evidence from the Toda-Yamamoto approach, Mar. Policy, 132, 10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104701 · DOI
  32. Carmona, 2022, Changes in the Spanish fish-canning industry since Spain’s entry to the European Union, Ocean Coast Manag, 216, 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105972 · DOI
  33. de Melo Ribeiro, 2019, Reuse alternatives for effluents from the fish processing industry through multi-criteria analysis, J. Clean. Prod., 227, 336, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.110 · DOI
  34. Cortés, 2021, Multi-product strategy to enhance the environmental profile of the canning industry towards circular economy, Sci. Total Environ., 791, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148249 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 7

Metadata

Authors
Fernández-González, R., Pérez-Vas, R., Pérez-Pérez, M., Pereira, Z. G. T., Puime-Guillén, F., & Ricoy-Casas, R. M.
Venue
Marine Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-05
Volume
163
Pages
106087
ISSN
0308-597X
DOI
10.1016/j.marpol.2024.106087
Cited by
7
References
0
Language
en
Licence
Funders
  • Xunta de Galicia (ED481D 2023/002, ED431C2018/48)
  • Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (RTI2018-099225-B-100)
  • Consellería de Cultura, Educación e Ordenación Universitaria, Xunta de Galicia
  • Federación Española de Enfermedades Raras
  • European Regional Development Fund (ED431C2018/48)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review