Cited by 30Marine and coastal plant biologyMarine Biology and Ecology ResearchMarine and coastal ecosystems

Epiphyte loads on seagrasses and microphytobenthos abundance are not reliable indicators of nutrient availability in oligotrophic coastal ecosystems

Fourqurean, James W., Muth, Meredith F., Boyer, Joseph N.·2010·Marine Pollution Bulletin

Abstract

Despite marked gradients in nutrient availability that control the abundance and species composition of seagrasses in south Florida, and the importance of nutrient availability in controlling abundance and composition of epiphytes on seagrasses in other locations, we did not find that epiphyte load on the dominant seagrass, Thalassia testudinum, or that the relative contribution of algal epiphytes to the epiphyte community, was positively correlated with nutrient availability in the water column or the sediment in oligotrophic seagrass beds. Further, the abundance of microphytobenthos, as indicated by Chlorophyll-a concentration in the sediments, was not directly correlated with concentrations of nutrients in the sediments. Our results suggest that epiphyte and microphytobenthos abundance are not unambiguous indicators of nutrient availability in relatively pristine seagrass environments, and therefore would make poor candidates for indicators of the status and trends of seagrass ecosystems in relatively low-nutrient environments like the Florida Keys.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2010.03.003

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Additional work has documented weak relationships between nutrient availability and epiphyte loading across seagrass meadows in Florida Bay and the Florida Keys.

    “Additional work has further documented weak relationships between nutrient availability and epiphyte loading across seagrass meadows in Florida Bay and the Florida Keys (Frankovich & Fourqurean 1997; Fourqurean, Muth & Boyer 2010).”

    From Ocean acidification outweighs nutrient effects in structuring seagrass epiphyte communities (2014) · cites this paper as Fourqurean, Muth & Boyer 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fourqurean, J. W., Muth, M. F., & Boyer, J. N.
Affiliations
  • Florida International University (US)
  • University of Virginia (US)
Corresponding author
Fourqurean, James W.
Venue
Marine Pollution Bulletin
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-07
Volume
60
Issue
7
Pages
971-983
ISSN
0025-326X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2025419456
Cited by
30
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Marine Pollution Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Florida International University Digital Commons (Florida International University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
  • Florida International University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine and coastal plant biology
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine Biology and Ecology Research
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine and coastal ecosystems
Keywords
seagrass epiphytes, microphytobenthos, nutrient availability, Thalassia testudinum, seagrass meadows, chlorophyll a, sediment nutrients, water column nutrients, indicator species, Florida Keys
MeSH terms
Eutrophication, Florida, Marine Biology, Nitrogen, Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Phosphorus, Phytoplankton, Population Dynamics, Seawater, Ecosystem, Hydrocharitaceae

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review