Coastal upwelling, circulation and heat balance around New Caledonia’s barrier reef
Abstract
An outstanding characteristic of New Caledonia upwelling is that most events appear limited to the southern half of the western barrier reef. This north-south difference cannot be explained by alongshore variability of the projected wind stress and no strong evidence for alternative explanations has been proposed. A major objective of this paper is to provide the first dynamical analysis of New Caledonia upwelling and its regional environment, based on numerical simulations. Coastal upwelling around New Caledonia is shown to be modulated by a system of geostrophic currents interacting with the island mass. Upwelling velocities are weaker than expected from the two-dimensional Ekman theory, as Ekman divergence is balanced by "coastal geostrophic convergence". The cooling effect of upwelling is also attenuated by alongshore transport of warm water by the Alis current, reminiscent of the Leeuwin current off Western Australia. Nevertheless, coastal upwelling can locally modify the large-scale surface water heat budget, dominated by meridional advection warming and surface cooling. The upwelled waters appear to be mostly of western origin and are transported below the surface by the Subtropical Counter Current before upwelling off New Caledonia. This appears in sharp contrast with the eastern barrier reef where the general warming by meridional advection of tropical surface waters is accentuated by the vigorous western boundary type Vauban current.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In many upwelling sectors, alongshore pressure gradients can yield onshore velocities that counteract, or more infrequently reinforce, the Ekman flow.
“In many upwelling sectors they can yield onshore velocities that counteract, or more infrequently reinforce, the Ekman flow (Colas et al. 2008;Marchesiello et al. 2010;Ndoye et al. 2017;Jacox et al. 2018).”
From Competition between Baroclinic Instability and Ekman Transport under Varying Buoyancy Forcings in Upwelling Systems: An Idealized Analog to the Southern Ocean (2021) · cites this paper as Marchesiello et al. 2010
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 36 · Cited by 56
- Authors
- Marchesiello, P., Lefèvre, J., Vega, A., Couvelard, X., & Menkes, C.
- Affiliations
- Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (NC)
- Corresponding author
- Marchesiello, Patrick
- Venue
- Marine Pollution Bulletin
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 7-12
- Pages
- 432-448
- ISSN
- 0025-326X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2021050802
- Cited by
- 56
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Marine Pollution Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- French coastal environment research program
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Earth-Surface Processes › Coastal and Marine Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
- Keywords
- coastal upwelling, geostrophic currents, Ekman divergence, Leeuwin Current, surface heat budget, meridional advection, western boundary currents, island mass effect
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Environmental Monitoring, Hot Temperature, Models, Theoretical, New Caledonia, Seasons, Water Movements, Wind, Ecosystem, Anthozoa
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review