Cited by 56Oceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesCoastal and Marine DynamicsMeteorological Phenomena and Simulations

Coastal upwelling, circulation and heat balance around New Caledonia’s barrier reef

Marchesiello, Patrick, Lefèvre, Jérôme, Vega, Andres, Couvelard, Xavier, Menkes, Christophe·2010·Marine Pollution Bulletin

Abstract

An outstanding characteristic of New Caledonia upwelling is that most events appear limited to the southern half of the western barrier reef. This north-south difference cannot be explained by alongshore variability of the projected wind stress and no strong evidence for alternative explanations has been proposed. A major objective of this paper is to provide the first dynamical analysis of New Caledonia upwelling and its regional environment, based on numerical simulations. Coastal upwelling around New Caledonia is shown to be modulated by a system of geostrophic currents interacting with the island mass. Upwelling velocities are weaker than expected from the two-dimensional Ekman theory, as Ekman divergence is balanced by "coastal geostrophic convergence". The cooling effect of upwelling is also attenuated by alongshore transport of warm water by the Alis current, reminiscent of the Leeuwin current off Western Australia. Nevertheless, coastal upwelling can locally modify the large-scale surface water heat budget, dominated by meridional advection warming and surface cooling. The upwelled waters appear to be mostly of western origin and are transported below the surface by the Subtropical Counter Current before upwelling off New Caledonia. This appears in sharp contrast with the eastern barrier reef where the general warming by meridional advection of tropical surface waters is accentuated by the vigorous western boundary type Vauban current.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2010.06.043

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 36 · Cited by 56

Authors
Marchesiello, P., Lefèvre, J., Vega, A., Couvelard, X., & Menkes, C.
Affiliations
Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (NC)
Corresponding author
Marchesiello, Patrick
Venue
Marine Pollution Bulletin
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010
Volume
61
Issue
7-12
Pages
432-448
ISSN
0025-326X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2021050802
Cited by
56
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Marine Pollution Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
French coastal environment research program
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Earth-Surface Processes › Coastal and Marine Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Keywords
coastal upwelling, geostrophic currents, Ekman divergence, Leeuwin Current, surface heat budget, meridional advection, western boundary currents, island mass effect
MeSH terms
Animals, Environmental Monitoring, Hot Temperature, Models, Theoretical, New Caledonia, Seasons, Water Movements, Wind, Ecosystem, Anthozoa

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review