Cited by 407Protease and Inhibitor MechanismsWound Healing and TreatmentsTGF-β signaling in diseases

Matrix remodeling by MMPs during wound repair

Open access
Rohani, Maryam G., Parks, William C.·2015·Matrix Biology

Abstract

Repair following injury involves a range of processes - such as re-epithelialization, scar formation, angiogenesis, inflammation, and more - that function, often together, to restore tissue architecture. MMPs carry out diverse roles in all of these activities. In this article, we discuss how specific MMPs act on ECM during two critical repair processes: re-epithelialization and resolution of scar tissue. For wound closure, we discuss how two MMPs - MMP1 in human epidermis and MMP7 in mucosal epithelia - facilitate re-epithelialization by cleaving different ECM or ECM-associated proteins to affect similar integrin:matrix adhesion. In scars and fibrotic tissues, we discuss that a variety of MMPs carry out a diverse range of activities that can either promote or limit ECM deposition. However, few of these MMP-driven activities have been demonstrated to be due a direct action on ECM.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.matbio.2015.03.002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ECM biomaterials are recognized by surrounding cells and gradually degraded by proteolytic enzymes, mainly matrix metalloproteinases (MMP-1, MMP-8, MMP-3, MMP-9).

    “On the other hand, ECM biomaterials are recognized by surrounding cells, and, gradually degraded by proteolytic enzymes, mainly matrix metalloproteinases (i.e., MMP-1, MMP-8, MMP-3, MMP-9) [55,56].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 104 · Cited by 407

Authors
Rohani, M. G., & Parks, W. C.
Affiliations
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Parks, William C.
Venue
Matrix Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-05
Volume
44-46
Pages
113-121
ISSN
0945-053X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2034166961
Cited by
407
References
104
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 51 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 6
FWCI
3.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Matrix Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Protease and Inhibitor Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › TGF-β signaling in diseases
Keywords
matrix metalloproteinases, extracellular matrix remodeling, wound healing, re-epithelialization, scar formation, fibrosis, MMP-1, MMP-7, human epidermis
MeSH terms
Animals, Cicatrix, Extracellular Matrix, Humans, Wound Healing, Wounds and Injuries, Gene Expression Regulation, Enzymologic, Matrix Metalloproteinases, Re-Epithelialization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review