Cited by 137Advanced Welding Techniques AnalysisWelding Techniques and Residual StressesElectronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Interfacial microstructure evolution and weld formation during ultrasonic welding of Al alloy to Cu

Fujii, H.T., Endo, H., Sato, Y.S., Kokawa, H.·2018·Materials Characterization

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.matchar.2018.03.010

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • After micro-bonds between aluminum and copper form, intense shear deformation occurs parallel to ultrasonic vibrations, leading to a recrystallized microstructure with a shear texture aligned with the {111}⟨011⟩ orientation near the bonded interface.

    “Fuji et al. [36] reported that after the establishment of micro-bonds between aluminum (Al) and copper (Cu), an intense shear deformation occurred in parallel with the ultrasonic vibrations.This process led to the creation of a recrystallized microstructure featuring a shear texture aligned with the {111}⟨011⟩ orientation near the bonded interface.”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. Brodyanski, 2005, Nm scale resolution studies of the bond interface between ultrasonically welded Al-alloys by an analytical TEM – a path to comprehend bonding phenomena, Appl. Surf. Sci., 252, 94, 10.1016/j.apsusc.2005.02.003 · DOI
  2. Fujii, 2011, Quantitative evaluation of bulk and interface microstructures in Al 3003 alloy builds made by very high power ultrasonic additive manufacturing, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 42, 4045, 10.1007/s11661-011-0805-x · DOI · Paper page
  3. Patel, 2011, Influence of ultrasonic spot welding on microstructure in a magnesium alloy, Scr. Mater., 65, 911, 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.08.009 · DOI
  4. Chen, 2012, HAZ development and accelerated post weld nature ageing in ultrasonic spot welding aluminium 6111 T4 automotive sheet, Acta Mater., 60, 2816, 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.01.047 · DOI
  5. Shimizu, 2014, Mechanism of weld formation during very-high-power ultrasonic additive manufacturing of Al alloy 6061, Acta Mater., 74, 234, 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.04.043 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Bakavos, 2010, Mechanisms of joint and microstructure formation in high power ultrasonic spot welding 6111 aluminum automotive sheet, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 527, 6320, 10.1016/j.msea.2010.06.038 · DOI
  7. Sriraman, 2011, Thermal transients during processing of materials by very high power ultrasonic additive manufacturing, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 211, 1650, 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2011.05.003 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Sriraman, 2012, Thermal transients during processing of 3003 Al-H18 multilayer build by very high-power ultrasonic additive manufacturing, Metall. Mater. Trans. B Process Metall. Mater. Process. Sci., 43B, 133, 10.1007/s11663-011-9590-6 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Okada, 1963, Joint mechanism of ultrasonic welding, Trans. JIM, 4, 250, 10.2320/matertrans1960.4.250 · DOI
  10. Murdeshwar, 1997, A microstructural study of dislocation substructures formed in metal foil substrates during ultrasonic wire bonding, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 28, 2663, 10.1007/s11661-997-0023-8 · DOI
  11. Matsuoka, 2009, Direct welding of different metals used ultrasonic vibration, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 209, 954, 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.03.006 · DOI
  12. Zhao, 2013, Effect of welding energy on interface zone of Al-Cu ultrasonic welded joint, Sci. Technol. Weld. Join., 18, 354, 10.1179/1362171813Y.0000000114 · DOI
  13. Balasundaram, 2014, Effect of zinc interlayer on ultrasonic spot welded aluminum to copper joints, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 607, 277, 10.1016/j.msea.2014.03.135 · DOI
  14. Yang, 2014, Microstructural evolution and mechanical properties of Cu-Al joints by ultrasonic welding, Sci. Technol. Weld. Join., 19, 500, 10.1179/1362171814Y.0000000218 · DOI
  15. Wu, 2015, Microstructure welding mechanism and failure of Al-Cu ultrasonic welds, J. Manuf. Process., 20, 321, 10.1016/j.jmapro.2015.06.002 · DOI
  16. Zhang, 2015, Ultrasonic weldability of al ribbon to cu sheet and the dissimilar joint formation mode, Mater. Trans., 56, 1842, 10.2320/matertrans.M2015251 · DOI
  17. Milan, 2016, Microstructural analysis of laser micro-welds between copper and aluminum, Microsyst. Technol., 22, 261, 10.1007/s00542-014-2385-3 · DOI
  18. Ni, 2016, Microstructure and mechanical performances of ultrasonic spot welded Al-Cu joints with Al 2219 alloy particle interlayer, Mater. Des., 92, 779, 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.12.132 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Ni, 2016, Weldability and mechanical properties of ultrasonic joining of aluminum to copper alloy with an interlayer, Mater. Lett., 182, 19, 10.1016/j.matlet.2016.06.071 · DOI
  20. Chen, 2017, Effect of acoustic softening on the thermal-mechanical process of ultrasonic welding, Ultrasonics, 75, 9, 10.1016/j.ultras.2016.11.004 · DOI
  21. Ni, 2017, Effect of lap configuration on the microstructure and mechanical properties of dissimilar ultrasonic metal welded copper-aluminum joints, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 245, 180, 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.02.027 · DOI
  22. Shin, 2017, Mechanical performance and electrical resistance of ultrasonic welded multiple Cu-Al layers, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 241, 141, 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.11.004 · DOI
  23. Watanabe, 2009, Ultrasonic welding mild steel sheet to Al-Mg alloy sheet, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 209, 5475, 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.05.006 · DOI
  24. Prangnell, 2011, Ultrasonic spot welding of aluminium to steel for automotive applications - microstructure and optimization, Mater. Sci. Technol., 27, 617, 10.1179/026708310X520484 · DOI
  25. Haddadi, 2012, Effect of zinc coatings on joint properties and interfacial reactions in aluminum to steel ultrasonic spot welding, JOM, 64, 407, 10.1007/s11837-012-0265-9 · DOI
  26. Mirza, 2016, Effect of welding energy on microstructure and strength of ultrasonic spot welded dissimilar joints of aluminum to steel sheets, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 668, 73, 10.1016/j.msea.2016.05.040 · DOI
  27. Fujii, 2016, Microstructure and lap shear strength of the weld interface in ultrasonic welding of Al alloy to stainless steel, Scr. Mater., 116, 135, 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.02.004 · DOI
  28. Haddadi, 2016, The effect of interface reaction on vibration evolution and performance of aluminum to steel high power ultrasonic spot welding, Mater. Des., 89, 50, 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.09.121 · DOI
  29. Mirza, 2017, Microstructure, tensile and fatigue properties of ultrasonic spot welded aluminum to galvanized high-strength-low-alloy and low-carbon steel sheets, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 690, 323, 10.1016/j.msea.2017.03.023 · DOI
  30. Macwan, 2017, Ultrasonic spot welded 6111-T4 aluminum alloy to galvanized high-strength low-alloy steel - microstructure and mechanical properties, Mater. Des., 113, 284, 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.10.025 · DOI
  31. Zhang, 2014, Microstructural characterization and mechanical properties of high power ultrasonic spot welded aluminum alloy AA6111 Ti6Al4V dissimilar joints, Mater. Charact., 97, 83, 10.1016/j.matchar.2014.09.001 · DOI
  32. Sridharan, 2016, Microstructure and texture evolution in aluminum and commercially pure titanium dissimilar welds fabricated using ultrasonic additive manufacturing, Scr. Mater., 117, 1, 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.02.013 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Patel, 2012, Microstructure and mechanical properties of dissimilar welded Mg-Al joints by ultrasonic spot welding technique, Sci. Technol. Weld. Join., 17, 202, 10.1179/1362171811Y.0000000094 · DOI
  34. Robson, 2012, Modelling intermetallic phase formation in dissimilar metal ultrasonic welding of aluminum and magnesium alloys, Sci. Technol. Weld. Join., 17, 447, 10.1179/1362171812Y.0000000032 · DOI
  35. Panteli, 2012, The effect of high strain rate deformation on intermetallic reaction during ultrasonic welding aluminum to magnesium, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 556, 31, 10.1016/j.msea.2012.06.055 · DOI
  36. Evertsson, 2015, The thickness of native oxides on aluminum alloys and single crystals, Appl. Surf. Sci., 349, 826, 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.05.043 · DOI
  37. Toth, 1988, Effect of rate sensitivity on the stability of torsion textures, Acta Metall., 36, 3077, 10.1016/0001-6160(88)90045-4 · DOI
  38. Fujii, 2017, High-strain-rate deformation in ultrasonic additive manufacturing, Scr. Mater., 135, 125, 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.12.030 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Gunduz, 2005, Enhanced diffusion and phase transformations during ultrasonic welding of zinc and aluminum, Scr. Mater., 52, 939, 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.12.015 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Fujii, H. T., Endo, H., Sato, Y. S., & Kokawa, H.
Affiliations
Tohoku University (JP)
Corresponding author
Fujii, H.T.
Venue
Materials Characterization
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-05
Volume
139
Pages
233-240
ISSN
1044-5803 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2800788989
Cited by
137
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 2
FWCI
6.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Materials Characterization (publishedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (24760590)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies
Keywords
ultrasonic spot welding, dissimilar metal welding, copper-aluminum interface, interfacial microstructure, anodized aluminum, material flow, compressive deformation, intermetallic compound growth, Al2Cu, recrystallization, shear texture, weld formation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review