Cited by 108Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical ApplicationsNerve injury and regeneration3D Printing in Biomedical Research

Electrohydrodynamic jet 3D-printed PCL/PAA conductive scaffolds with tunable biodegradability as nerve guide conduits (NGCs) for peripheral nerve injury repair

Open access
Vijayavenkataraman, Sanjairaj, Thaharah, Siti, Zhang, Shuo, Lu, Wen Feng, Fuh, Jerry Ying Hsi·2019·Materials & Design

Abstract

NGCs are considered as an alternative treatment method for treating peripheral nerve injuries in place of nerve autografts. Biomimicry, conductivity, and biodegradability are the properties expected of an ideal NGC. PCL/PAA NGCs with three different concentrations of PAA (2.5, 5 and 7.5%) were fabricated using EHD-jet 3D printing. The mechanical properties of the PCL/PAA NGCs mimic the native human nerve properties (ultimate tensile strength of 6.5 to 11.7 MPa) and the conductivity match that of the amphibian motor nerve fiber myelin sheath (10 −6 S/cm). The in vitro degradation studies reveal that they are biodegradable and injury/site-specific biodegradability can be obtained by tuning the PCL/PAA concentration ratio. In addition, PAA being a polyanionic polymer has the potential to act as a cation-exchanger, mimicking the functions of the nerve cortical gel layer, thereby influencing the electrophysiological phenomena called nerve excitation and conduction. Neural differentiation studies with PC12 cells assessed by the Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) and immunocytochemistry showed enhanced gene expression with the presence of PAA. Our results suggest that the EHD-jet 3D printed porous conductive PCL/PAA NGCs has the potential to be used in the treatment of peripheral nerve injuries.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.11.044

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PCL is approved by the FDA and widely used in bone regeneration because of its mechanical properties, good biocompatibility, and easy processing due to its low melting temperature of about 60 °C.

    “poly(ɛ-caprolactone) (PCL), approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), is widely used in bone regeneration because of its mechanical properties, good biocompatibility, and easy processing due to the low melting temperature of ~ 60 °C [27][28][29][30][31]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vijayavenkataraman, S., Thaharah, S., Zhang, S., Lu, W. F., & Fuh, J. Y. H.
Affiliations
National University of Singapore (SG)
Corresponding author
Vijayavenkataraman, Sanjairaj
Venue
Materials & Design
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-01
Volume
162
Pages
171-184
ISSN
0264-1275 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2902403596
Cited by
108
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 6
FWCI
3.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Materials & Design (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • National University of Singapore (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Ministry of Education - Singapore (R-265-000-584-114)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Keywords
nerve conduits, polycaprolactone, poly(acrylic acid), conductive scaffolds, nerve regeneration, PC12 cell differentiation, porous scaffolds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review