The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The select of internal architecture for porous Ti alloy scaffold: A compromise between mechanical properties and permeability
Open accessAbstract
With the hope to provide guidance to the design of additive manufactured porous orthopaedic implants and bone substitutes, three different topological porous structures (primitive, gyroid, bcc) with a porosity of 65% were designed and fabricated by selective laser melting using Ti-6Al-4V powders. The compressive and tensile properties of the porous scaffolds were investigated using quasi-static compression and tensile tests, respectively. Deformation behaviors of porous structures were analyzed by finite element simulation at different compression strains and loading condition. The Gyroid scaffolds have the highest compressive strength and tensile strength of 392.1 MPa and 321.3 MPa, respectively, almost two times higher than that of BCC scaffolds. Permeability of the scaffolds was measured using the falling head method and compared with the results of the computational fluid dynamics. The results showed that the permeability of the Gyroid scaffolds was about 20% that of the BCC scaffolds. It was suggested internal architecture for porous Ti alloy scaffold could significantly affect the mechanical stress and permeability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SLM lattice structures: Properties, performance, applications and challenges
Maconachie, T., Leary, M., Lozanovski, B., Zhang, X., Qian, M., Faruque, O., & Brandt, M. (2019) · Materials & Design · doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108137 · Cited by 1,497
Lambers, F. M., Bouman, A. R., Tkachenko, E. V., Keaveny, T. M., & Hernandez, C. J. (2014) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.10.011 · Cited by 36
Cited by
Design, printing, and engineering of regenerative biomaterials for personalized bone healthcare
Jia, Z., Xu, X., Zhu, D., & Zheng, Y. (2023) · Progress in Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2023.101072 · Cited by 176
Metadata
- Authors
- Yu, G., Li, Z., Li, S., Zhang, Q., Hua, Y., Liu, H., Zhao, X., Dhaidhai, D. T., Li, W., & Wang, X.
- Venue
- Materials & Design
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-07
- Volume
- 192
- Pages
- 108754
- ISSN
- 0264-1275 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3018392879
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The select of internal architecture for porous Ti alloy scaffold: A compromise between mechanical properties and permeability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108754
- The paper
- Yu, G., Li, Z., Li, S., Zhang, Q., Hua, Y., Liu, H., Zhao, X., Dhaidhai, D. T., Li, W., & Wang, X. (2020). The select of internal architecture for porous Ti alloy scaffold: A compromise between mechanical properties and permeability. Materials & Design. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108754
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
