The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Deep learning for topology optimization of 2D metamaterials
Open accessAbstract
Data-driven models are rising as an auspicious method for the geometrical design of materials and structural systems. Nevertheless, existing data-driven models customarily address the optimization of structural designs rather than metamaterial designs. Metamaterials are emerging as promising materials exhibiting tailorable and unprecedented properties for a wide spectrum of applications. In this paper, we develop a deep learning (DL) model based on a convolutional neural network (CNN) that predicts optimal metamaterial designs. The developed DL model non-iteratively optimizes metamaterials for either maximizing the bulk modulus, maximizing the shear modulus, or minimizing the Poisson's ratio (including negative values). The data are generated by solving a large set of inverse homogenization boundary values problems, with randomly generated geometrical features from a specific distribution. Such s data-driven model can play a vital role in accelerating more computationally expensive design problems, such as multiscale metamaterial systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation
Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., & Brox, T. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28 · Cited by 99,404
Raissi, M., Perdikaris, P., & Karniadakis, G. E. (2019) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045 · Cited by 20,384
Cellular solids structure and properties
Gibson, L. J., Ashby, M. F., et al. (1997) · Cited by 9,172
Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method
Bendsøe, M. P., & Kikuchi, N. (1988) · Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering · doi:10.1016/0045-7825(88)90086-2 · Cited by 7,467
Cellular solids: Structure and properties
Wolcott, M. P. (1990) · Materials Science and Engineering: A · doi:10.1016/0921-5093(90)90295-e · Cited by 5,926
Bioinspired structural materials
Wegst, U. G. K., Bai, H., Saiz, E., Tomsia, A. P., & Ritchie, R. O. (2015) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat4089 · Cited by 4,721
Optimal shape design as a material distribution problem
Bendsøe, M. P. (1989) · Structural Optimization · doi:10.1007/bf01650949 · Cited by 4,521
Road Extraction by Deep Residual U-Net
Zhang, Z., Liu, Q., & Wang, Y. (2018) · IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters · doi:10.1109/lgrs.2018.2802944 · Cited by 3,179
A Practical Guide to Training Restricted Boltzmann Machines
Hinton, G. E. (2012) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-35289-8_32 · Cited by 2,852
A 99 line topology optimization code written in Matlab
Sigmund, O. (2001) · Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization · doi:10.1007/s001580050176 · Cited by 2,688
Cited by
Mechanical metamaterials and beyond
Jiao, P., Mueller, J., Raney, J. R., Zheng, X., & Alavi, A. H. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-41679-8 · Cited by 733
Metadata
- Authors
- Kollmann, H. T., Abueidda, D. W., Koric, S., Guleryuz, E., & Sobh, N. A.
- Venue
- Materials & Design
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-11
- Volume
- 196
- Pages
- 109098
- ISSN
- 0264-1275 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3082366755
- Cited by
- 361
- References
- 62
- FWCI
- 26.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deep learning for topology optimization of 2D metamaterials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.109098
- The paper
- Kollmann, H. T., Abueidda, D. W., Koric, S., Guleryuz, E., & Sobh, N. A. (2020). Deep learning for topology optimization of 2D metamaterials. Materials & Design. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.109098
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.