Cited by 134Temporomandibular Joint DisordersMyofascial pain diagnosis and treatmentMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Efficacy of musculoskeletal manual approach in the treatment of temporomandibular joint disorder: A systematic review with meta-analysis

Martins, Wagner Rodrigues, Blasczyk, Juscelino Castro, Aparecida Furlan de Oliveira, Micaele, Lagôa Gonçalves, Karina Ferreira, Bonini-Rocha, Ana Clara, Dugailly, Pierre-Michel, de Oliveira, Ricardo Jacó·2016·Manual Therapy

Abstract

Background Temporomandibular joint disorder (TMD) requires a complex diagnostic and therapeutic approach, which usually involves a multidisciplinary management. Among these treatments, musculoskeletal manual techniques are used to improve health and healing. Objectives To assess the effectiveness of musculoskeletal manual approach in temporomandibular joint disorder patients. Design A systematic review with meta-analysis. Methods During August 2014 a systematic review of relevant databases (PubMed, The Cochrane Library, PEDro and ISI web of knowledge) was performed to identify controlled clinical trials without date restriction and restricted to the English language. Clinical outcomes were pain and range of motion focalized in temporomandibular joint. The mean difference (MD) or standard mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and overall effect size were calculated at every post treatment. The PEDro scale was used to demonstrate the quality of the included studies. Results/findings From the 308 articles identified by the search strategy, 8 articles met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis showed a significant difference (p Conclusions Musculoskeletal manual approaches are effective for treating TMD. In the short term, there is a larger effect regarding the latter when compared to other conservative treatments for TMD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.math.2015.06.009

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 29 · Cited by 134

Authors
Martins, W. R., Blasczyk, J. C., Aparecida Furlan de Oliveira, M., Lagôa Gonçalves, K. F., Bonini-Rocha, A. C., Dugailly, P.-M., & de Oliveira, R. J.
Affiliations
  • Universidade de Brasília (BR)
  • Instituto Brasileiro de Osteopatia (BR)
  • Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE)
Corresponding author
Martins, Wagner Rodrigues
Venue
Manual Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-02
Volume
21
Pages
10-17
ISSN
1356-689X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1903143330
Cited by
134
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2
FWCI
1.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Manual Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Complementary and Manual Therapy › Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
temporomandibular disorders, jaw pain, conservative treatment
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Temporomandibular Joint, Temporomandibular Joint Disorders, Range of Motion, Articular, Musculoskeletal Manipulations, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review