Electrospun polyurethane nanofibres having shape memory effect
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Electrospun PCL-based SMPU fibers of ultrafine diameters between 50 and 700 nm showed good shape memory properties as evidenced by cyclic tensile tests.
“In a further contribution [169], the group reported on the fabrication of electrospun PCL-based SMPU fibers of ultrafine diameters between 50 and 700 nm.The nanofibers showed good SM properties as evidenced by cyclic tensile tests.”
From Review on the Functional Determinants and Durability of Shape Memory Polymers (2010) · cites this paper as [169]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 23 · Cited by 109
- Authors
- Zhuo, H., Hu, J., & Chen, S.
- Affiliations
- Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
- Corresponding author
- Hu, Jinlian
- Venue
- Materials Letters
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-05
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 2074-2076
- ISSN
- 0167-577X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2043573802
- Cited by
- 109
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 1.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Materials Letters (publishedVersion)
- PolyU Institutional Research Archive (Hong Kong Polytechnic University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer composites and self-healing
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Advanced Materials and Mechanics
- Keywords
- shape memory effect, electrospinning, shape memory polymers, polymer concentration, shape recovery, shape fixity, segmented polymers, cyclic tensile testing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review