The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Preparation of porous MoS2 via a sol–gel route using (NH4)2Mo3S13 as precursor
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The incorporation of CNT into the MoSx aerogel increased the surface area, although the intrinsic surface area of CNT was smaller (88.9 m2/g).
“The incorporation of CNT into the MoSx aerogel increased the surface area, although the intrinsic surface area of CNT was smaller (88.9 m2/g).”
From Synthesis of amorphous MoSx and MoSx/carbon nanotubes composite aerogels as effective hydrogen evolution reaction catalysts (2018) · cites this paper as [14]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- Li, 2009, J Alloys Compd, 471, 442, 10.1016/j.jallcom.2008.03.133 · DOI
- Alonso, 2002, J Catal, 208, 359, 10.1006/jcat.2002.3553 · DOI
- Yoosuk, 2008, Catal Today, 130, 14, 10.1016/j.cattod.2007.07.003 · DOI
- Afanasiev, 2010, J Catal, 269, 269, 10.1016/j.jcat.2009.11.004 · DOI
- Skrabalak, 2005, J Am Chem Soc, 127, 9990, 10.1021/ja051654g · DOI
- Yang, 2008, Catal Commun, 9, 1364, 10.1016/j.catcom.2007.11.035 · DOI
- Vanchura, 2002, J Am Chem Soc, 124, 12090, 10.1021/ja025786a · DOI
- Shi, 2007, J Am Chem Soc, 129, 9522, 10.1021/ja072910n · DOI
- Bag, 2009, Nat Chem, 1, 217, 10.1038/nchem.208 · DOI
- Shafaei-Fallah, 2011, Adv Mater, 23, 4857, 10.1002/adma.201102006 · DOI
- Shafaei-Fallah, 2011, J Am Chem Soc, 133, 1200, 10.1021/ja1089028 · DOI
- Mohanan, 2005, Science, 307, 397, 10.1126/science.1104226 · DOI
- Kalebaila, 2006, J Non-Cryst Solids, 352, 232, 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2005.11.035 · DOI
- Müller, 1978, Angew Chem Int Ed, 17, 535, 10.1002/anie.197805351 · DOI
- Chu, 2000, Mater Lett, 43, 81, 10.1016/S0167-577X(99)00235-9 · DOI
- Tian, 2006, Mater Lett, 60, 527, 10.1016/j.matlet.2005.09.029 · DOI
- Hibble, 2001, J Mater Chem, 11, 2607, 10.1039/b103129p · DOI
- Sun, 2010, Tetrahedron, 66, 7794, 10.1016/j.tet.2010.07.051 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ultralow Density, Monolithic WS2, MoS2, and MoS2/Graphene Aerogels
Worsley, M. A., Shin, S. J., Merrill, M. D., Lenhardt, J., Nelson, A. J., Woo, L. Y., Gash, A. E., Baumann, T. F., & Orme, C. A. (2015) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.5b00087 · Cited by 182
Gao, Q., Jin, Y., Jin, Y., Wang, X., Ye, Z., Hong, Z., & Zhi, M. (2018) · Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology · doi:10.1007/s10971-018-4793-9 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, N., Chai, Y., Dong, B., Liu, B., Guo, H., & Liu, C.
- Affiliations
- China University of Petroleum, East China (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Liu, Chenguang
- Venue
- Materials Letters
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-12
- Volume
- 88
- Pages
- 112-115
- ISSN
- 0167-577X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2316669564
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5
- FWCI
- 0.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Materials Letters (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Mesoporous Materials and Catalysis
- Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Catalysis › Catalysis and Hydrodesulfurization Studies
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Chemical and Physical Properties of Materials
- Keywords
- MoS2, sol-gel synthesis, high surface area, pore size distribution, formamide
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
