Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An innovative method to fabricate honeycomb-like poly(ε-caprolactone)/nano-hydroxyapatite scaffolds

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.matlet.2012.11.046

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Cited by

See all 17

Metadata

Authors
Qian, J., Xu, M., Suo, A., Yang, T., & Yong, X.
Affiliations
  • Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN)
  • First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN)
Corresponding author
Qian, Junmin
Venue
Materials Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-02
Volume
93
Pages
72-76
ISSN
0167-577X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2021561818
Cited by
17
References
17
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3
FWCI
1.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
Locations
Materials Letters (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
Keywords
polycaprolactone, hydroxyapatite nanoparticles, honeycomb microstructure, biotemplating, bone tissue engineering, bimodal pore distribution, porosity, compressive modulus, cytocompatibility, MG-63 cells, cell adhesion and proliferation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An innovative method to fabricate honeycomb-like poly(ε-caprolactone)/nano-hydroxyapatite scaffolds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.matlet.2012.11.046
The paper
Qian, J., Xu, M., Suo, A., Yang, T., & Yong, X. (2013). An innovative method to fabricate honeycomb-like poly(ε-caprolactone)/nano-hydroxyapatite scaffolds. Materials Letters. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2012.11.046

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.