Water vapour permeability of innovative building materials from different waste
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The water vapour resistance properties obtained for the WW-based fillers are in the range of 2.2-3.3, in good agreement with the values of vegetable fibres such as wood (3-10), hemp, flax and corn (1-3).
“the water vapour resistance properties obtained for the WW-based fillers are in the range of 2.2–3.3, which are in a good agreement with the values of vegetable fibres, such as wood (3–10), hemp, flax and corn (1–3), as presented in Reference [40]”
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Augaitis, N., Vaitkus, S., Członka, S., & Kairytė, A. (2020) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma13235336 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
- Authors
- Buratti, C., Belloni, E., & Merli, F.
- Affiliations
- University of Perugia (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Buratti, C.
- Venue
- Materials Letters
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-04
- Volume
- 265
- Pages
- 127459
- ISSN
- 0167-577X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3004286461
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 2.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Materials Letters (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Hygrothermal properties of building materials
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Building energy efficiency and sustainability
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production
- Keywords
- water vapor permeability, hygrothermal performance, recycled waste materials, leather cutting, rice husk, moisture transport, gypsum plaster, expanded polystyrene, indoor comfort, heat loss
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
