CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 24

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Synergistic effect of anaerobic co-digestion of South African food waste with cow manure: Role of low density-polyethylene in process modulation

Awosusi, Ayotunde, Sethunya, Vuiswa, Matambo, Tonderayi·2021·Materials Today: Proceedings
DOI 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.584
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.584

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. Adam, 2010, Free Basic Electricity: A better life for all, Earthlife Africa
  2. Ismail, 2015, Determinants of energy poverty in South Africa, J. Energy S. Afr., 26, 66, 10.17159/2413-3051/2015/v26i3a2130 · DOI
  3. Wu, 2019, Techno-economic analysis of biogas production from microalgae through anaerobic digestion, InBiogas, 27
  4. Hugo, W. BioEnergy Feasibility in South Africa, presented at the EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts, 2015, vol. 17, p. 4374.
  5. Lindorfer, H., and Frauz, B., Biogas Biorefineries, in. Industrial Biorefineries & White Biotechnology, A. Pandey, R. Höfer, M. Taherzadeh, K. M. Nampoothiri, and C. Larroche, Eds. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2015, pp. 271–294. · DOI
  6. Angelidaki, 1999, A comprehensive model of anaerobic bioconversion of complex substrates to biogas, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 63, 363, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19990505)63:3<363::AID-BIT13>3.0.CO;2-Z · DOI
  7. Awe, 2017, A review of biogas utilisation, purification and upgrading technologies, Waste Biomass Valor, 8, 267, 10.1007/s12649-016-9826-4 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Álvarez, 2010, A methodology for optimising feed composition for anaerobic co-digestion of agro-industrial wastes, Bioresour. Technol., 101, 1153, 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.09.061 · DOI
  9. Gil, 2017, Optimizing the selection of organic waste for biomethanization, Environ. Technol.
  10. Hagos, 2017, Anaerobic co-digestion process for biogas production: Progress, challenges and perspectives, Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 76, 1485, 10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.184 · DOI
  11. Mata-Alvarez, 2000, Anaerobic digestion of organic solid wastes. An overview of research achievements and perspectives, Bioresour. Technol., 74, 3, 10.1016/S0960-8524(00)00023-7 · DOI
  12. Zhang, 2014, Reviewing the anaerobic digestion of food waste for biogas production, Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 38, 383, 10.1016/j.rser.2014.05.038 · DOI
  13. Shin, 2018, Effect of seaweed addition on enhanced anaerobic digestion of food waste and sewage sludge, Environ. Eng. Res., 24, 449, 10.4491/eer.2018.275 · DOI
  14. Meng, 2015, Evaluating biomethane production from anaerobic mono-and co-digestion of food waste and floatable oil (FO) skimmed from food waste, Bioresour. Technol., 185, 7, 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.02.036 · DOI
  15. Ahn, 2019, Enhancement of sewage sludge digestion by co-digestion with food waste and swine waste, Waste Biomass Valorization, 1
  16. Sambo, 1995, Effect of some operating parameters on biogas production rate, Renewable Energy, 6, 343, 10.1016/0960-1481(95)00027-H · DOI
  17. Cheng, 2014, Development and application of prefabricated biogas digesters in developing countries, Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 34, 387, 10.1016/j.rser.2014.03.035 · DOI
  18. Mukumba, 2015, An assessment of the performance of a biogas digester when insulated with sawdust, Int. J. Energy Power Eng., 4, 24, 10.11648/j.ijepe.20150402.12 · DOI
  19. Mutungwazi, 2018, Biogas digester types installed in South Africa: A review, Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 81, 172, 10.1016/j.rser.2017.07.051 · DOI
  20. Bavutti, M., Guidetti, L., Allesina, G., Libbra, A., Muscio, A. and Pedrazzi, S., Thermal stabilization of digesters of biogas plants by means of optimization of the surface radiative properties of the gasometer domes. (2014) 1344–1353. · DOI
  21. Zhang, 2014, Reviewing the anaerobic digestion of food waste for biogas production, Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 38, 383, 10.1016/j.rser.2014.05.038 · DOI
  22. Chen, 2010, Anaerobic digestion of food wastes for biogas production, Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng., 3, 61
  23. Awe, 2017, Effect of oil content on biogas production, process performance and stability of food waste anaerobic digestion, Waste Biomass Valorization, 1
  24. Zahan, Z., Othman, M. Z., Rajendram, W. Anaerobic codigestion of municipal wastewater treatment plant sludge with food waste : A case study, 2016, 2016. · DOI
  25. El-Mashad, 2010, Biogas production from co-digestion of dairy manure and food waste, Bioresour. Technol., 101, 4021, 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.01.027 · DOI
  26. Bouallagui, 2009, Improvement of fruit and vegetable waste anaerobic digestion performance and stability with co-substrates addition, J. Environ. Manage., 90, 1844, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.12.002 · DOI
  27. Tanimu, M. I., Ghazi, T. I. M. Harun, R. M., Idris, A. Effect of carbon to nitrogen ratio of food waste on biogas methane production in a batch mesophilic anaerobic digester, Int. J. Innov. Manage. Technol., 2014, 5(2), 116–119, 2014, doi: 10.7763/IJIMT.2014.V5.497. · DOI
  28. Matheri, 2017, Analysis of the biogas productivity from dry anaerobic digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste, Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.068 · DOI
  29. Iqbal, 2014, Anaerobic digestion of kitchen waste to produce biogas, Procedia Eng., 90, 657, 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.11.787 · DOI
  30. Tian, 2015, Anaerobic co-digestion of kitchen waste and pig manure with different mixing ratios, J. Biosci. Bioeng., 120, 51, 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2014.11.017 · DOI
  31. Xie, S. Evaluation of biogas production from anaerobic digestion of pig manure and grass silage, Phd Thesis, National University of Ireland, 2012.
  32. Ostrem, K. Greening waste: anaerobic digestion for treating the organic fraction of municipal solid waste,” Department of Earth and Environmental Engineering Fu Foundation of School of Engineering and Applied Science, Columbia University, no. The Earth Engineering Center and the Henry Krumb School of Mines, pp. 1–59, 2004.
  33. Zhang, 2016, Using a hybrid heating system to increase the biogas production of household digesters in cold areas of China: an experimental study, Appl. Therm. Eng., 103, 1299, 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.05.027 · DOI
  34. Liu, 2017, Investigation on the heat loss characteristic of underground household biogas digester using dynamic simulations and experiments, Biosyst. Eng., 163, 116, 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2017.09.002 · DOI
  35. Pandey P. K., Soupir, M. L. Impacts of temperatures on biogas production in dairy manure anaerobic digestion impacts of temperatures on biogas production in dairy manure, 2012, doi: 10.7763/IJET.2012.V4.448. · DOI
  36. Tamkin, 2015, Impact of organic loading rates on the performance of variable temperature biodigesters, Ecol. Eng., 78, 87, 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.06.005 · DOI
  37. Bansal, 1985, A study of a greenhouse concept on conventional biogas systems for enhancing biogas yield in winter months, Int. J. Energy Res., 9, pp, 10.1002/er.4440090203 · DOI
  38. Sodha, 1987, Effect of PVC greenhouse in increasing the biogas production in temperate cold climatic conditions, Energy Convers. Manage., 27, pp, 10.1016/0196-8904(87)90057-4 · DOI
  39. Pietzsch M., Meyer J., Use of reject heat from biogas power plants for greenhouse heating, International Symposium on High Technology for Greenhouse System Management: Greensys. 801 (2007). · DOI
  40. Ghasemi, 2016, Solar energy conservation in greenhouse: thermal analysis and experimental validation, Renewable Energy, 96, 509, 10.1016/j.renene.2016.04.079 · DOI
  41. Hassanein, 2015, Simulation and validation of a model for heating underground biogas digesters by solar energy, Ecol. Eng., 82, 336, 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.05.010 · DOI
  42. Al bkoor Alrawashdeh K, Pugliese A, Slopiecka K, Pistolesi V, Massoli S, Bartocci P, Bidini G, Fantozzi F. Codigestion of untreated and treated sewage sludge with the organic fraction of municipal solid wastes. Fermentation. 2017;3(3):35. · DOI
  43. Kumar, 2008, Solar greenhouse assisted biogas plant in hilly region–A field study, Sol. Energy, 82, 911, 10.1016/j.solener.2008.03.005 · DOI
  44. Bajpai, P. Anaerobic reactors used for waste water treatment, Anaerobic Technology in Pulp and Paper Industry, pp. 37–53, 2017, doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-4130-3. · DOI
  45. Manonmani, P., Muazu, L., Kamaraj, M. C., Goel, M. and Elangomathavan, R. Biogas Production Potential of Food Waste, no. 2, pp. 707–711, 2017. · DOI
  46. Agrahari, R. P. Utilization of Kitchen Waste inside Green House Chamber : A Community Level Biogas Programme” vol. 110016, no. 12, pp. 908–912, 2013

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 24

Metadata

Authors
Awosusi, A., Sethunya, V., & Matambo, T.
Venue
Materials Today: Proceedings
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021
Volume
38
Pages
793-803
ISSN
2214-7853
DOI
10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.584
Cited by
24
References
1
Language
en
Licence
Funders
Institute for the Development of Energy for African Sustainability, Early Career Leadership research fellowship

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review