Cited by 19Engineering and Information TechnologyOpen Source Software InnovationsHistory of Computing Technologies

A comparative study on shells in Linux: A review

Kidwai, Abdullah, Arya, Chandrakala, Singh, Prabhishek, Diwakar, Manoj, Singh, Shilpi, Sharma, Kanika, Kumar, Neeraj·2021·Materials Today: Proceedings

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.08.508

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kidwai, A., Arya, C., Singh, P., Diwakar, M., Singh, S., Sharma, K., & Kumar, N.
Affiliations
  • Amity University (IN)
  • Graphic Era Hill University (IN)
  • Graphic Era University (IN)
  • Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University (IN)
Corresponding author
  • Arya, Chandrakala
  • Singh, Prabhishek
  • Diwakar, Manoj
Venue
Materials Today: Proceedings
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021
Volume
37
Pages
2612-2616
ISSN
2214-7853 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3088057074
Cited by
19
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
FWCI
5.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Materials Today Proceedings (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Engineering and Information Technology
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Open Source Software Innovations
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › History of Computing Technologies
Keywords
Linux shell, Linux distributions, shell scripting, interactive shell, interprocess communication, interrupt handling, system performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review