Cited by 74Geotechnical Engineering and Soil StabilizationGeotechnical and construction materials studiesMaterials Engineering and Processing

Stabilization of expansive subgrade soil by using fly ash

Gireesh Kumar, P., Harika, S.·2021·Materials Today: Proceedings

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.11.469

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gireesh Kumar, P., & Harika, S.
Venue
Materials Today: Proceedings
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021
Volume
45
Pages
6558-6562
ISSN
2214-7853 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3114054102
Cited by
74
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 4
FWCI
4.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Materials Today Proceedings (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geotechnical and construction materials studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Materials Engineering and Processing
Keywords
expansive soil, Vertisols, fly ash stabilization, subgrade soil stabilization, California bearing ratio, unconfined compressive strength, Atterberg limits, free swell index, plasticity index, pavement subgrade, waste reuse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review