Cited by 264Electric Vehicles and InfrastructureEnvironmental Impact and SustainabilityVehicle emissions and performance

Life cycle assessment of electric vehicles in comparison to combustion engine vehicles: A review

Verma, Shrey, Dwivedi, Gaurav, Verma, Puneet·2022·Materials Today: Proceedings

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.01.666

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Verma, S., Dwivedi, G., & Verma, P.
Affiliations
  • Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology (IN)
  • Queensland University of Technology (AU)
Corresponding author
  • Dwivedi, Gaurav
  • Verma, Puneet
Venue
Materials Today: Proceedings
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022
Volume
49
Pages
217-222
ISSN
2214-7853 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3135377612
Cited by
264
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 78 · 2024: 72 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 6
FWCI
11.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Materials Today Proceedings (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Vehicle emissions and performance
Keywords
electric vehicles, internal combustion engine vehicles, life cycle assessment, life cycle cost analysis, greenhouse gas emissions, human toxicity, battery manufacturing, drivetrain, fossil fuel vehicles, LCA software, battery cost

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review