Cited by 55Geotechnical Engineering and Soil StabilizationGeotechnical and construction materials studiesConcrete and Cement Materials Research

Strength, and durability characteristics of GGBS geopolymer stabilized black cotton soil

Noolu, Venkatesh, Mallikarjuna Rao, G., Sudheer kumar reddy, B., Chavali, Rama Vara Prasad·2021·Materials Today: Proceedings

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.01.939

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Noolu, V., Mallikarjuna Rao, G., Sudheer kumar reddy, B., & Chavali, R. V. P.
Affiliations
Siddhartha Academy of Higher Education (IN)
Corresponding author
Noolu, Venkatesh
Venue
Materials Today: Proceedings
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021
Volume
43
Pages
2373-2376
ISSN
2214-7853 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3134249598
Cited by
55
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4
FWCI
4.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Materials Today Proceedings (publishedVersion)
Funders
JNTUH
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geotechnical and construction materials studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Concrete and Cement Materials Research
Keywords
geopolymer stabilization, ground granulated blast furnace slag, Vertisols, expansive soil, unconfined compressive strength, durability, wetting-drying cycles, sodium hydroxide, soil stabilization, subgrade improvement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review