Stabilization of expansive soil using flyash based geopolymer
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The conclusion that AABS2 has the best comprehensive effect is similar to the findings of prior studies.
“This conclusion is similar to the findings in [27,35,36].”
From Expansive Soil Stabilization Using Alkali-Activated Fly Ash (2023) · cites this paper as [36]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Expansive Soil Stabilization Using Alkali-Activated Fly Ash
Wang, H., Liu, T., Yan, C., & Wang, J. (2023) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr11051550 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
- Authors
- Santhikala, R., Chandramouli, K., & Pannirselvam, N.
- Affiliations
- SRM Institute of Science and Technology (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Pannirselvam, N.
- ORCID
- Pannirselvam, N.
- Venue
- Materials Today: Proceedings
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022
- Volume
- 68
- Pages
- 110-114
- ISSN
- 2214-7853 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4285605762
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 3.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Materials Today Proceedings (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geotechnical and construction materials studies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Concrete and Cement Materials Research
- Keywords
- expansive soil, fly ash geopolymer, soil stabilization, cement stabilization, unconfined compressive strength, binder content, A/B ratio, industrial waste binders, CO2 emission reduction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review