Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 538

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 152 of the 152 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Machine learning the quantum-chemical properties of metal–organic frameworks for accelerated materials discovery

Open access
Rosen, Andrew S., Iyer, Shaelyn M., Ray, Debmalya, Yao, Zhenpeng, Aspuru-Guzik, Alán, Gagliardi, Laura, Notestein, Justin M., Snurr, Randall Q.·2021·Matter

Abstract

Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) are a widely investigated class of crystalline solids with tunable structures that make it possible to impart specific chemical functionality tailored for a given application. However, the enormous number of possible MOFs that can be synthesized makes it difficult to determine which materials would be the most promising candidates, especially for applications governed by electronic structure properties that are often computationally demanding to simulate and time-consuming to probe experimentally. Here, we have developed the first publicly available quantum-chemical database for MOFs (the “QMOF database”), which consists of properties derived from density functional theory (DFT) for over 14,000 experimentally synthesized MOFs. Throughout this study, we demonstrate how this new database can be used to identify MOFs with targeted electronic structure properties. As a proof-of-concept, we use the QMOF database to evaluate the performance of several machine learning models for the prediction of DFT-computed band gaps and find that crystal graph convolutional neural networks are capable of achieving superior predictive performance, making it possible to circumvent computationally expensive quantum-chemical calculations. We also show how unsupervised learning methods can aid the discovery of otherwise subtle structure–property relationships using the computational findings in this work. We conclude by highlighting several MOFs with low band gaps, a challenging task given the electronically insulating nature of most MOF structures. The data and predictive models generated in this work, as well as the database of MOF structures, should be highly useful to other researchers interested in the predictive design and discovery of MOFs for the many applications dictated by quantum-chemical phenomena.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.matt.2021.02.015

Cites

152 of 152 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 152 references

Cited by

See all 538

Metadata

Authors
Rosen, A. S., Iyer, S. M., Ray, D., Yao, Z., Aspuru-Guzik, A., Gagliardi, L., Notestein, J. M., & Snurr, R. Q.
Venue
Matter
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-05
Volume
4
Issue
5
Pages
1578-1597
ISSN
2590-2385 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3143460494
Cited by
538
References
152
FWCI
20.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Machine learning the quantum-chemical properties of metal–organic frameworks for accelerated materials discovery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.matt.2021.02.015
The paper
Rosen, A. S., Iyer, S. M., Ray, D., Yao, Z., Aspuru-Guzik, A., Gagliardi, L., Notestein, J. M., & Snurr, R. Q. (2021). Machine learning the quantum-chemical properties of metal–organic frameworks for accelerated materials discovery. Matter. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matt.2021.02.015

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.