Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,167

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Spintronics based random access memory: a review

Open access
Bhatti, Sabpreet, Sbiaa, Rachid, Hirohata, Atsufumi, Ohno, Hideo, Fukami, Shunsuke, Piramanayagam, S.N.·2017·Materials Today

Abstract

This article reviews spintronics based memories, in particular, magnetic random access memory (MRAM) in a systematic manner. Debuted as a humble 4 Mb product by FreeScale in 2006, the MRAM has grown to a 256 Mb product of Everspin in 2016. During this period, MRAM has overcome several hurdles and have reached a stage, where the potential for MRAM is very promising. One of the main hurdles that the MRAM overcome between 2006 and 2016 is the way the information is written. The 4 Mb MRAM used a magnetic field based switching technology that would be almost impossible to scale below 100 nm. The 256 Mb MRAM, on the other hand uses a different writing mechanism based on Spin Transfer Torque (STT), which is scalable to very low dimensions. In addition to the difference in the writing mechanism, there has also been a major shift in the storage material. Whereas the 4 Mb MRAM used materials with in-plane magnetic anisotropy, the 256 Mb MRAM uses materials with a perpendicular magnetic anisotropy (PMA). MRAM based on PMA is also scalable to much higher densities. The paper starts with a brief history of memory technologies, followed by a brief description of the working principles of MRAM for novice. Reading information from MRAM, the technologies, materials and the physics behind reading of bits in MRAM are described in detail. As a next step, the physics and technologies involved in writing information are described. The magnetic field based writing and its limitations are described first, followed by an explanation of STT mechanism. The materials and physics behind storage of information is described next. MRAMs with in-plane magnetization, their layered material structure and the disadvantages are described first, followed by the advantages of MRAMs with perpendicular magnetization, their advantages etc. The technologies to improve writability and potential challenges and reliability issues are discussed next. Some of the future technologies that might help the industry to move beyond the conventional MRAM technology are discussed at the end of the paper, followed by a summary and an outlook.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mattod.2017.07.007

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 1,167

Metadata

Authors
Bhatti, S., Sbiaa, R., Hirohata, A., Ohno, H., Fukami, S., & Piramanayagam, S. N.
Venue
Materials Today
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-11
Volume
20
Issue
9
Pages
530-548
ISSN
1369-7021 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2742177062
Cited by
1,167
References
2
FWCI
33.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spintronics based random access memory: a review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.mattod.2017.07.007
The paper
Bhatti, S., Sbiaa, R., Hirohata, A., Ohno, H., Fukami, S., & Piramanayagam, S. N. (2017). Spintronics based random access memory: a review. Materials Today. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2017.07.007

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.