The DOI matches its Crossref record; 121 of the 121 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A reality check and tutorial on electrochemical characterization of battery cell materials: How to choose the appropriate cell setup
Abstract
Abstract The ever-increasing demand for electrical energy storage technologies triggered by the demands for consumer electronics, stationary energy storage systems and especially the rapidly growing market of electro mobility boosts the need for cost-effective, highly efficient and highly performant rechargeable battery systems. After the successful implementation of lithium ion batteries (LIBs) in consumer electronics and electric vehicles, there is still a need for further improvements in terms of energy and power densities, safety, cost and lifetime. In the last decades, a large battery research community has evolved, developing all kinds of new battery materials, e.g., positive and negative electrode active materials for different cell chemistries, electrolytes, related auxiliary (inactive) materials and their constituents. Different battery cell setups, including so-called “half-cell”, “symmetrical-cell” and “full-cell” setups as well as two-electrode or three-electrode configurations, are described in the literature to be used in the laboratory for the electrochemical characterization of battery components like electrode materials and electrolytes. Typically, all cell setups display certain limitations or issues concerning their application for the parameter determination of battery materials. In this review article, we highlight the advantages but also the limitations of different cell setups, with special focus on two- and three-electrode configurations with or without the help of “auxiliary” excess capacity Li metal electrodes. We point out possible mistakes and/or misinterpretations and give the reader recommendations, i.e., a guide for the right choice of the cell setup/configuration appropriate for the intended aim of the electrochemical investigation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Electrochemical Methods: Fundamentals and Applications
Bard, A. J., & Faulkner, L. R. (1980) · Cited by 22,435
Electrochemical Methods: Fundamentals and Applications
de Rooij, D. M. R. (2003) · Anti-Corrosion Methods and Materials · doi:10.1108/acmm.2003.12850eae.001 · Cited by 13,009
Nonaqueous Liquid Electrolytes for Lithium-Based Rechargeable Batteries
Xu, K. (2004) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr030203g · Cited by 7,437
Lithium Batteries and Cathode Materials
Whittingham, M. S. (2004) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr020731c · Cited by 6,267
Electrolytes and Interphases in Li-Ion Batteries and Beyond
Xu, K. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500003w · Cited by 5,566
Performance and cost of materials for lithium-based rechargeable automotive batteries
Schmuch, R., Wagner, R., Hörpel, G., Placke, T., & Winter, M. (2018) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/s41560-018-0107-2 · Cited by 3,233
Self-citationWinter, M., Barnett, B., & Xu, K. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00422 · Cited by 2,193
Self-citationReview—SEI: Past, Present and Future
Peled, E., & Menkin, S. (2017) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/2.1441707jes · Cited by 2,182
Alloy Negative Electrodes for Li-Ion Batteries
Obrovac, M. N., & Chevrier, V. L. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500207g · Cited by 2,175
Nickel‐Rich Layered Lithium Transition‐Metal Oxide for High‐Energy Lithium‐Ion Batteries
Liu, W., Oh, P., Liu, X., Lee, M., Cho, W., Chae, S., Kim, Y., & Cho, J. (2015) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201409262 · Cited by 1,960
Cited by
A rechargeable zinc-air battery based on zinc peroxide chemistry
Sun, W., Wang, F., Zhang, B., Zhang, M., Küpers, V., Ji, X., Theile, C., Bieker, P., Xu, K., Wang, C., et al. (2021) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abb9554 · Cited by 1,082
Self-citationA non-academic perspective on the future of lithium-based batteries
Frith, J. T., Lacey, M. J., & Ulissi, U. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-35933-2 · Cited by 820
Impedance Analysis of Electrochemical Systems
Vivier, V., & Orazem, M. E. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00876 · Cited by 615
In situ polymerization process: an essential design tool for lithium polymer batteries
Vijayakumar, V., Anothumakkool, B., Kurungot, S., Winter, M., & Nair, J. R. (2021) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d0ee03527k · Cited by 365
Self-citationHomann, G., Stolz, L., Nair, J., Laskovic, I. C., Winter, M., & Kasnatscheew, J. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-61373-9 · Cited by 284
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Nölle, R., Beltrop, K., Holtstiege, F., Kasnatscheew, J., Placke, T., & Winter, M.
- Venue
- Materials Today
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-01
- Volume
- 32
- Pages
- 131-146
- ISSN
- 1369-7021 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2969971633
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 121
- FWCI
- 14.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A reality check and tutorial on electrochemical characterization of battery cell materials: How to choose the appropriate cell setup. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.mattod.2019.07.002
- The paper
- Nölle, R., Beltrop, K., Holtstiege, F., Kasnatscheew, J., Placke, T., & Winter, M. (2020). A reality check and tutorial on electrochemical characterization of battery cell materials: How to choose the appropriate cell setup. Materials Today. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2019.07.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.