Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 309

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A review on self-healing polymers for soft robotics

Open access
Terryn, Seppe, Langenbach, Jakob, Roels, Ellen, Brancart, Joost, Bakkali-Hassani, Camille, Poutrel, Quentin-Arthur, Georgopoulou, Antonia, George Thuruthel, Thomas, Safaei, Ali, Ferrentino, Pasquale, Sebastian, Tutu, Norvez, Sophie, Iida, Fumiya, Bosman, Anton W., Tournilhac, François, Clemens, Frank, Van Assche, Guy, Vanderborght, Bram·2021·Materials Today

Abstract

Abstract The intrinsic compliance of soft robots provides safety, a natural adaptation to its environment, allows to absorb shocks, and protects them against mechanical impacts. However, a literature study shows that the soft polymers used for their construction are susceptible to various types of damage, including fatigue, overloads, interfacial debonding, and cuts, tears and perforations by sharp objects. An economic and ecological solution is to construct future soft robotic systems out of self-healing polymers, incorporating the ability to heal damage. This review paper proposes criteria to evaluate the potential of a self-healing polymer to be used in soft robotic applications. Based on these soft robotics requirements and on defined performance parameters of the materials, linked to the mechanical and healing properties, the different types of self-healing polymers already available in literature are critically assessed and compared. In addition to a description of the state of the art on self-healing soft robotics, the paper discusses the driving forces and limitations to spur the interdisciplinary combination between self-healing polymer science and soft robotics.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mattod.2021.01.009

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 12 references

Cited by

See all 309

Metadata

Authors
Terryn, S., Langenbach, J., Roels, E., Brancart, J., Bakkali-Hassani, C., Poutrel, Q.-A., Georgopoulou, A., George Thuruthel, T., Safaei, A., Ferrentino, P., Sebastian, T., Norvez, S., Iida, F., Bosman, A. W., Tournilhac, F., Clemens, F., Van Assche, G., & Vanderborght, B.
Venue
Materials Today
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-07
Volume
47
Pages
187-205
ISSN
1369-7021 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3139086409
Cited by
309
References
12
FWCI
18.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review on self-healing polymers for soft robotics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.mattod.2021.01.009
The paper
Terryn, S., Langenbach, J., Roels, E., Brancart, J., Bakkali-Hassani, C., Poutrel, Q.-A., Georgopoulou, A., George Thuruthel, T., Safaei, A., Ferrentino, P., Sebastian, T., Norvez, S., Iida, F., Bosman, A. W., Tournilhac, F., Clemens, F., Van Assche, G., & Vanderborght, B. (2021). A review on self-healing polymers for soft robotics. Materials Today. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2021.01.009

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.