Cited by 36Menopause: Health Impacts and TreatmentsReproductive Health and ContraceptionHypothalamic control of reproductive hormones

Age at menopause and determinants of hysterectomy and menopause in a multi-ethnic community: The Hilo Women's Health Study

Open access
Sievert, Lynnette Leidy, Murphy, Lorna, Morrison, Lynn A., Reza, Angela M., Brown, Daniel E.·2013·Maturitas

Abstract

Objectives A lifespan approach was used to evaluate age at menopause, and determinants of surgical and natural menopause, in the multi-ethnic community of Hilo, Hawaii. Study design Participants aged 40–60 years (n=898) were drawn from a larger, randomly-generated sample recruited by postal questionnaires. Median age at natural menopause was computed by probit analysis. Logistic regression analysis was applied to examine determinants of hysterectomy, and Cox regression analysis was used to examine risk factors for an earlier age at menopause. Main outcome measures History of hysterectomy, Age at menopause Results Frequency of hysterectomy was 19.2% at a mean age of 40.5 years. The likelihood of hysterectomy increased with older ages, lower education, mixed ancestry, having been overweight at age 30, and married 20 years prior to survey. Median age at natural menopause was 53.0 years. Smoking and not being married 10 years before survey were associated with an earlier age at menopause. Conclusions Median age at menopause was later than the national average. Ethnicity and education were determinants of hysterectomy, but not associated with age at natural menopause. Events later in the lifespan (e.g., smoking and not being married 10 years prior to the survey) were more important than earlier events (e.g., childhood residence) in relation to age at menopause. The timing of weight gain and marital status appear to be important in relation to surgical menopause, and the timing of marital status appears to be important in relation to the timing of natural menopause.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.maturitas.2013.08.007

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The higher risk of coronary heart disease among women who had hysterectomy/oophorectomy compared with those who did not was not altered when potential confounding factors such as age, parity, BMI, and race/ethnicity were adjusted for in multivariable analyses.

    “We observed higher risk of CHD among women who had a hysterectomy/oophorectomy compared to women who did not have a hysterectomy/oophorectomy. These associations were not altered when potential confounding factors, e.g., age, parity, BMI, race/ethnicity (45-47), were adjusted for in the multivariable analyses.”

    From Endometriosis and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease (2016) · cites this paper as [47]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 63 · Cited by 36

Authors
Sievert, L. L., Murphy, L., Morrison, L. A., Reza, A. M., & Brown, D. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
  • University of Hawaii at Hilo (US)
Corresponding author
  • Sievert, Lynnette Leidy
  • Murphy, Lorna
  • Morrison, Lynn A.
  • Reza, Angela M.
  • Brown, Daniel E.
Venue
Maturitas
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-12
Volume
76
Issue
4
Pages
334-341
ISSN
0378-5122 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1971999106
Cited by
36
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Maturitas (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • ScholarWorks@UMassAmherst (University of Massachusetts Amherst) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (S06-GM08073-35, S06GM008073)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
Keywords
age at menopause, hysterectomy, surgical menopause, natural menopause, smoking, marital status, educational attainment, ethnicity, body mass index
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Educational Status, Ethnicity, Female, Hawaii, Humans, Hysterectomy, Menopause, Menopause, Premature, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Smoking, Socioeconomic Factors, Weight Gain, Logistic Models, Proportional Hazards Models, Women's Health, Marital Status

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review