Cited by 81Aging and Gerontology ResearchIntergenerational Family Dynamics and CaregivingDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Is grandparenting a form of social engagement that benefits cognition in ageing?

Burn, Katherine, Szoeke, Cassandra·2015·Maturitas

Abstract

Social engagement is a lifestyle factor that has received much attention in preventative research. Numerous studies in the current literature have argued the importance of social engagement in ageing, particularly for cognitive health. One key example of social engagement in later life is the role of a grandparent. This role promotes a socially active lifestyle that may be beneficial to cognitive ageing. Recent research has found that spending some time with grandchildren is beneficial; however, the pressures and responsibilities characteristic of this role should also be taken into consideration, as they may have opposing effects on cognitive health. Given the current popularity of grandparenting as a form of childcare, the interests of the grandparents and the impact on ageing health need to be carefully considered.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.maturitas.2014.10.017

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Grandparents who provide instrumental (frequent or primary) care often experience psychological distress, depressive symptoms, anxiety, marital strain, and poorer cognitive functioning, comparable to other high-stress caregiving groups.

    “Grandparents who provide instrumental (frequent or primary) care often experience psychological distress, depressive symptoms, anxiety, marital strain, and poorer cognitive functioning, comparable to other high-stress caregiving groups (Burn & Szoeke, 2015; Grinstead et al., 2003; Kelley et al., 2021; Minkler & Fuller-Thomson, 2001; Winefield & Air, 2010).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burn, K., & Szoeke, C.
Affiliations
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Venue
Maturitas
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-02
Volume
80
Issue
2
Pages
122-125
ISSN
0378-5122 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1974129833
Cited by
81
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Maturitas (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Alzheimer's Australia
  • Australian Menopausal Society
  • Brain Foundation
  • Alzheimer's Association
  • Shepherd Foundation
  • Scobie and Claire McKinnon Foundation
  • Collier Trust Fund, the Ramaciotti Foundation
  • Pharmaceuticals
  • J.O. & J.R. Wicking Trust
  • Piramal Life Sciences
  • Mason Foundation
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
grandparenting, social engagement, cognitive aging, cognitive health, old age, lifestyle factors
MeSH terms
Cognitive Aging, Grandparents, Aging, Child, Child Care, Cognition, Family, Humans, Social Behavior, Social Participation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review