Cited by 17Menopause: Health Impacts and TreatmentsHeart Failure Treatment and ManagementPregnancy and preeclampsia studies

Reproductive factors in relation to heart failure in women: A systematic review

Open access
Bolijn, Renee, Onland-Moret, N. Charlotte, Asselbergs, Folkert W., van der Schouw, Yvonne T.·2017·Maturitas

Abstract

Background The biological mechanisms underlying the sex-related differences in risk of heart failure are still not well understood. The aim of this review was to provide an overview of the current evidence on the association between reproductive factors and risk of heart failure in women.Methods A systematic review of the literature was conducted. PubMed and Embase databases were searched for publications on the following reproductive factors as potential risk factors for heart failure in women: age at menarche, duration and frequency of the menstrual cycle, reproductive lifespan, use of contraception, polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS), pregnancy characteristics (e.g. parity), pregnancy complications (e.g. preeclampsia), induced abortion, history of breastfeeding, fertility status, use of assisted reproductive methods, hysterectomy, age at menopause, and use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT).Results Twenty-one studies were eligible for inclusion. Hypertensive pregnancy disorders, preterm delivery or small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infants, shorter reproductive duration, and early menopause were risk factors for heart failure in women. It was suggested that PCOS, fertility therapy, gestational diabetes, and age at first pregnancy were not related to risk of heart failure, but a potential relation cannot be fully excluded as most studies were not of sufficient quality. Conflicting results were found for the associations between risk of heart failure and hysterectomy, gravidity and parity, and HRT.Conclusion Although some reproductive factors were considered risk factors for heart failure in women, the results were mostly conflicting or inconclusive. Further research is needed to confirm and expand the current evidence on the association between reproductive factors and risk of heart failure.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.maturitas.2017.09.004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 59 · Cited by 17

Authors
Bolijn, R., Onland-Moret, N. C., Asselbergs, F. W., & van der Schouw, Y. T.
Affiliations
Utrecht University (NL)
Venue
Maturitas
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-12
Volume
106
Pages
57-72
ISSN
0378-5122 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2531619540
Cited by
17
References
59
Citations by year
2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 2
FWCI
0.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Maturitas (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Keywords
heart failure, women, reproductive factors, sex differences, age at menarche, menstrual cycle, reproductive period, contraception, polycystic ovary syndrome, pregnancy complications, preeclampsia, abortion, breastfeeding, fertility status, hysterectomy, menopause, hormone replacement therapy, parity, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, preterm birth, small for gestational age
MeSH terms
Female, Heart Failure, Humans, Reproduction, Risk Factors, Reproductive History

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review