Supervised Exercise–Based Intervention to Prevent Excessive Gestational Weight Gain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Abstract
Objective To study the effect on maternal weight gain of a supervised light- to moderate-intensity exercise-based intervention performed from the ninth week of pregnancy. Participants and methods A total of 962 healthy pregnant women were randomly assigned to a standard care or exercise intervention group conducted between September 1, 2007, and January 31, 2011. The intervention included light- to moderate-intensity aerobic and resistance exercises performed 3 days a week (50-55 minutes per session). Excessive gestational weight gain was calculated on the basis of the 2009 Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommendations. Gestational body weight gain was calculated on the basis of the weight measured at the first prenatal visit (fifth to sixth weeks of gestation) and weight measured at the last visit to the clinic before delivery. Women were categorized into normal weight or overweight or obese. Results Women in the intervention group gained less weight (adjusted mean difference, 1.039 kg; 95% CI, 0.534-1.545 kg; P<.001) and were less likely to gain weight above the IOM recommendations (odds ratio, 0.625; 95% CI, 0.461-0.847) compared with those in the standard care group. The main treatment effects according to body mass index category were that normal weight women in the intervention group gained less weight (adjusted mean difference, 1.393 kg; 95% CI, 0.813-1.972 kg; P<.001) and were less likely to gain weight above the IOM recommendations (odds ratio, 0.508; 95% CI, 0.334-0.774) than normal weight women who received standard care. No significant treatment effect was observed in overweight or obese women. Conclusion Supervised exercise of light to moderate intensity can be used to prevent excessive gestational weight gain, especially in normal weight women. Trial registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01790347.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In three studies there was blinding of personnel analysing data (low risk); in the rest information was insufficient.
“In three studies [18, 19, 21] there was blinding of the personnel analysing the data (low risk of bias), and in the rest of them there was not enough information to allow an assessment of low risk or high risk [16, 17, 20, 22].”
From A systematic review and meta-analysis of exercise-based intervention to prevent gestational diabetes in women with overweight or obesity (2025) · cites this paper as [20]
In five studies sequence concealment was low risk; in two it was unclear.
“Regarding the concealment of the sequence, in five studies sequence implementation was carried out by an independent person (low risk of bias) [16, 18, 19, 21, 22] and in two no information is presented [17, 20] (considered unclear risk because there was not enough information to allow an assessment of low risk or high risk).”
From A systematic review and meta-analysis of exercise-based intervention to prevent gestational diabetes in women with overweight or obesity (2025) · cites this paper as [20]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 48 · Cited by 181
- Authors
- Ruiz, J. R., Perales, M., Pelaez, M., Lopez, C., Lucia, A., & Barakat, R.
- Affiliations
- Universidad de Granada (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Ruiz, Jonatan R.
- ORCID
- Ruiz, Jonatan R.
- Venue
- Mayo Clinic Proceedings
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-12
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1388-1397
- ISSN
- 0025-6196 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2008160765
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 12.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Mayo Clinic Proceedings (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica (Universidad Europea) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
- Keywords
- gestational weight gain, excessive weight gain, supervised exercise, exercise during pregnancy, aerobic exercise, resistance training, maternal obesity, overweight in pregnancy, body mass index, Institute of Medicine weight gain recommendations
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Humans, Obesity, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Risk Factors, United States, Weight Gain, Exercise, National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine, U.S., Health and Medicine Division, Body Mass Index, Odds Ratio, Treatment Outcome, Practice Guidelines as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review