On Bartlett’s formulation of the Luria–Delbrück mutation model
Abstract
Current knowledge of microbial mutation rates was accumulated largely by means of fluctuation experiments. A mathematical model describing the cell dynamics in a fluctuation experiment is indispensable to the estimation of mutation rates through fluctuation experiments. In almost six decades the model formulated by Lea and Coulson dominated in research and application, although the model formulated by Bartlett is generally believed to describe the cell dynamics more faithfully. The neglect of the Bartlett formulation was mainly due to mathematical difficulties. The present investigation overcomes some of these difficulties, thereby paving the way for the application of the Bartlett formulation in estimating mutation rates. Specifically, the article offers an algorithm for computing the distribution function of the number of mutants under the Bartlett formulation. The article also provides algorithms for computing point and interval estimates of mutation rates that are based on the maximum-likelihood principle. In addition, the article examines and compares the asymptotic behavior of the distributions of the number of mutants under the two formulations.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The simulation algorithm that is a part of mlemur combines previously used approaches with the novel addition of phenotypic lag.
“Simulation algorithm that is a part of mlemur combines previously used approaches with the novel addition of phenotypic lag [38,39,46].”
From Efficient, robust, and versatile fluctuation data analysis using MLE MUtation Rate calculator (mlemur) (2023) · cites this paper as [39]
Cites
Analysis of the Luria–Delbrück distribution using discrete convolution powers
Ma, W. T., Sandri, G. V., & Sarkar, S. (1992) · Journal of Applied Probability · doi:10.1017/s0021900200043023 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
On Haldane’s formulation of Luria and Delbrück’s mutation model.
Zheng, Q. (2007) · Mathematical Biosciences · doi:10.1016/j.mbs.2007.03.003 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Łazowski, K. (2023) · Mutation Research - Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis · doi:10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2023.111816 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zheng, Q.
- Affiliations
- Texas A&M Health Science Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Zheng, Qi
- Venue
- Mathematical Biosciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-09
- Volume
- 215
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 48-54
- ISSN
- 0025-5564 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1989183527
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Mathematical Biosciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Society for Mathematical Biology
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Probability and Statistical Research
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics
- Keywords
- mutation rate estimation, maximum likelihood estimation, asymptotic behavior, cell dynamics
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Genetics, Microbial, Mathematics, Models, Genetic, Mutation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review