Cited by 37Control Systems and IdentificationMathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology ModelsCensus and Population Estimation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

A hybrid symbolic-numerical method for determining model structure

Choquet, R., Cole, D.J.·2012·Mathematical Biosciences

Abstract

In this article, we present a method for determining whether a model is at least locally identifiable and in the case of non-identifiable models whether any of the parameters are individually at least locally identifiable. This method combines symbolic and numeric methods to create an algorithm that is extremely accurate compared to other numeric methods and computationally inexpensive. A series of generic computational steps are developed to create a method that is ideal for practitioners to use. The algorithm is compared to symbolic methods for two capture-recapture models and a compartment model.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mbs.2012.02.002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 44 · Cited by 37

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Rothenberg, 1971, Identification in parametric models, Econometrica, 39, 577, 10.2307/1913267 · DOI
  2. Goodman, 1974, Exploratory latent structure analysis using both identifiable and unidentifiable models, Biometrika, 61, 215, 10.1093/biomet/61.2.215 · DOI
  3. Walter, 1981, Unidentifiable compartmental-models – what to do?, Mathematical Biosciences, 56, 1, 10.1016/0025-5564(81)90025-0 · DOI
  4. Shapiro, 1986, Asymptotic theory of overparameterized structural models, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81, 142, 10.1080/01621459.1986.10478251 · DOI
  5. Catchpole, 1997, Detecting parameter redundancy, Biometrika, 84, 187, 10.1093/biomet/84.1.187 · DOI
  6. Catchpole, 1998, Estimation in parameter-redundant models, Biometrika, 85, 462, 10.1093/biomet/85.2.462 · DOI
  7. Catchpole, 2002, Solving problems in parameter redundancy using computer algebra, Journal of Applied Statistics, 29, 625, 10.1080/02664760120108601 · DOI
  8. Gimenez, 2003, Parameter redundancy in multistate capture–recapture models, Biometrical Journal, 45, 704, 10.1002/bimj.200390043 · DOI
  9. Jiang, 2007, Age-dependent tag return models for estimating fishing mortality, natural mortality, and selectivity, Journal of Agricultural Biological and Environmental Statistics, 12, 177, 10.1198/108571107X197382 · DOI
  10. Rouan, 2009, A general framework for modeling memory in capture–recapture data, Journal of Agricultural Biological and Environmental Statistics, 14, 338, 10.1198/jabes.2009.06108 · DOI
  11. Hunter, 2009, Rank and redundancy of multistate mark-recapture models for seabird populations with unobservable states, vol. 3, 797
  12. Forcina, 2008, Identifiability of extended latent class models with individual covariates, Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 52, 5263, 10.1016/j.csda.2008.04.030 · DOI
  13. Cole, 2010, Determining the parametric structure of models, Mathematical Biosciences, 228, 16, 10.1016/j.mbs.2010.08.004 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Cole, 2010, Parameter redundancy with covariates, Biometrika, 97, 1002, 10.1093/biomet/asq041 · DOI
  15. Cole, 2010, A note on determining parameter redundancy in age-dependent tag return models for estimating fishing mortality, natural mortality and selectivity, Journal of Agricultural Biological and Environmental Statistics, 15, 431, 10.1007/s13253-010-0026-6 · DOI
  16. Cole, 2012, Determining parameter redundancy of multi-state mark-recapture models of sea birds, Journal of Ornithology, 10.1007/s10336-010-0574-0 · DOI
  17. Viallefont, 1998, Parameter identifiability and model selection in capture–recapture models: a numerical approach, Biometrical Journal, 40, 1, 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4036(199807)40:3<313::AID-BIMJ313>3.0.CO;2-2 · DOI
  18. Wang, 2009, Multiple-record systems estimation using latent class models, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Statistics, 51, 101, 10.1111/j.1467-842X.2008.00531.x · DOI
  19. Gimenez, 2004, Methods for investigating parameter redundancy, Animal Biodiversity and Conservation, 27, 561, 10.32800/abc.2004.27.0561 · DOI
  20. Choquet, 2004, M-surge: new software specifically designed for multistate recapture models, Animal Biodiversity and Conservation, 27, 207, 10.32800/abc.2004.27.0207 · DOI
  21. Choquet, 2009, Program E-surge: a software application for fitting multievent models, vol. 3, 845
  22. Petrie, 1969, Probabilistic functions of finite state Markov chains, The Annals of Mathematics Statistics, 40, 97, 10.1214/aoms/1177697807 · DOI
  23. Dochain, 1995, Structural identifiability of biokinetic models of activated sludge respiration, Water Research, 29, 2571, 10.1016/0043-1354(95)00106-U · DOI
  24. Allman, 2009, Identifiability of parameters in latent structure models with many observed variables, Annals of Statistics, 37, 3099, 10.1214/09-AOS689 · DOI
  25. D. Bearup, N.D. Evans, M.J. Chappell, The input–output relationship approach to structural identifiability analysis, in: UKACC International Conference ‘Control 2010’, Coventry, UK, 2010. · DOI
  26. Chappell, 1998, A procedure for generating locally identifiable reparameterisations of unidentifiable non-linear systems by the similarity transformation approach, Mathematical Biosciences, 148, 21, 10.1016/S0025-5564(97)10004-9 · DOI
  27. Evans, 2000, Extensions to a procedure for generating locally identifiable reparameterisations of unidentifiable systems, Mathematical Biosciences, 168, 137, 10.1016/S0025-5564(00)00047-X · DOI
  28. Lystig, 2002, Exact computation of the observed information matrix for hidden Markov models, Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 11, 678, 10.1198/106186002402 · DOI
  29. Van der Luis, 1969, Condition numbers and equilibration of matrices, Numerical Mathematics, 14, 14, 10.1007/BF02165096 · DOI
  30. Krantz, 1992, A primer of real analytic functions, vol. 4
  31. Lebreton, 1992, Modeling survival and testing biological hypotheses using marked animals: a unified approach with case studies, Ecological Monographs, 62, 67, 10.2307/2937171 · DOI
  32. Corless, 1997, The turing factorization of a rectangular matrix, SIGSAM Bulletin, 31, 20, 10.1145/271130.271135 · DOI
  33. Brownie, 1993, Capture–recapture studies for multiple strata including non-Markovian transitions, Biometrics, 1173, 10.2307/2532259 · DOI
  34. Pradel, 2005, Multievent: an extension of multistate capture–recapture models to uncertain states, Biometrics, 61, 442, 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00318.x · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Choquet, R., & Cole, D. J.
Affiliations
  • Centre d'Écologie Fonctionnelle et Évolutive (FR)
  • University of Kent (GB)
Corresponding author
Choquet, R.
Venue
Mathematical Biosciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-04
Volume
236
Issue
2
Pages
117-125
ISSN
0025-5564 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2046587620
Cited by
37
References
44
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
6.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Mathematical Biosciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Royal Society
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Control Systems and Identification
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Census and Population Estimation
Keywords
model structure selection, local identifiability, parameter identifiability, capture-recapture models, compartmental model, parameter estimation
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Animals, Models, Biological, Predatory Behavior, Ecosystem

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A hybrid symbolic-numerical method for determining model structure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.mbs.2012.02.002
The paper
Choquet, R., & Cole, D. J. (2012). A hybrid symbolic-numerical method for determining model structure. Mathematical Biosciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mbs.2012.02.002