Cited by 3Catalysis for Biomass ConversionCatalysis and Hydrodesulfurization StudiesCatalysts for Methane Reforming

Governing effect of catalyst acidity on the selectivity of guaiacol hydroconversion to fuel additives over supported Ni-catalysts

Open access
Novodárszki, Gyula, Shi, Yuting, Lónyi, Ferenc, Mihályi, Magdolna R., Barthos, Róbert, Valyon, József, Solt, Hanna E., Vikár, Anna·2025·Molecular Catalysis

Abstract

Ni catalysts with ∼5 wt% Ni content were prepared using SiO 2 , γ-Al 2 O 3 , zeolite H-Beta, and SAPO-11 as supports and studied in the hydroconversion of guaiacol (GUA) in a solvent-free, continuous flow-through catalytic system. The acidity of the catalyst was found to direct the reaction towards different dominant reaction pathways. Over the virtually non-acidic Ni/SiO 2 catalyst, the reaction was initiated by the hydrogenation of the aromatic ring, followed by hydrogenolysis reactions giving cyclohexane, methane and methanol as main products. Over γ-Al 2 O 3 and zeolite catalysts with Lewis and/or Brønsted acidity, the reaction was initiated by facile acid-catalyzed transmethylation reactions followed by metal-catalysed hydrogenation and hydrodeoxygenation (HDO) reactions. An O-free liquid product was obtained containing substantially all of the GUA carbon in methyl-substituted 6-membered carbocyclic moieties. The Brønsted acid catalysts are unfavorable due to their high activity in aromatic condensation reactions leading to coke deposition and rapid loss of activity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mcat.2025.115372

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 71 · Cited by 3

Authors
Novodárszki, G., Shi, Y., Lónyi, F., Mihályi, M. R., Barthos, R., Valyon, J., Solt, H. E., & Vikár, A.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Materials and Environmental Chemistry (HU)
  • Eötvös Loránd University (HU)
Corresponding author
Lónyi, Ferenc
Venue
Molecular Catalysis
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-10
Volume
585
Pages
115372
ISSN
2468-8231 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4412636032
Cited by
3
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 3
FWCI
0.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Molecular Catalysis (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • European Regional Development Fund
  • National Research, Development and Innovation Office (FK134332, SKHU/1902/4.1/001)
  • Nemzeti Kutatási Fejlesztési és Innovációs Hivatal
  • Nemzeti Kutatási, Fejlesztési és Innovaciós Alap
  • Interreg (SKHU/1902, SKHU/1902/4.1/001)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Catalysis for Biomass Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Catalysis and Hydrodesulfurization Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Catalysis › Catalysts for Methane Reforming
Keywords
guaiacol, hydroconversion, nickel catalysts, catalyst acidity, Lewis acidity, Brønsted acidity, fuel additives, transmethylation, hydrodeoxygenation, hydrogenolysis, aromatic condensation, coke formation, supported nickel catalysts, Hβ zeolite, SAPO-11, γ-Al2O3 support, SiO2 support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review