A multi-step, dynamic allosteric model of testosterone's binding to sex hormone binding globulin
Abstract
Purpose Circulating free testosterone (FT) levels have been used widely in the diagnosis and treatment of hypogonadism in men. Due to experimental complexities in FT measurements, the Endocrine Society has recommended the use of calculated FT (cFT) as an appropriate approach for estimating FT. We show here that the prevailing model of testosterone's binding to SHBG, which assumes that each SHBG dimer binds two testosterone molecules and that the two binding sites on SHBG have similar binding affinity is erroneous and provides FT values that differ substantially from those obtained using equilibrium dialysis.Methods We characterized testosterone's binding to SHBG using binding isotherms, ligand depletion curves, and isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC). We derived a new model of testosterone's binding to SHBG from these experimental data and used this model to determine FT concentrations and compare these values with those derived from equilibrium dialysis.Results Experimental data on testosterone's association with SHBG generated using binding isotherms including equilibrium binding, ligand depletion experiments, and ITC provide evidence of a multi-step dynamic process, encompassing at least two inter-converting microstates in unliganded SHBG, readjustment of equilibria between unliganded states upon binding of the first ligand molecule, and allosteric interaction between two binding sites of SHBG dimer. FT concentrations in men determined using the new multistep dynamic model with complex allostery did not differ from those measured using equilibrium dialysis. Systematic error in calculated FT vales in females using Vermeulen's model was also significantly reduced. In European Male Aging Study, the men deemed to have low FT (<2.5th percentile) by the new model were at increased risk of sexual symptoms and elevated LH.Conclusion Testosterone's binding to SHBG is a multi-step dynamic process that involves complex allostery within SHBG dimer. FT values obtained using the new model have close correspondence with those measured using equilibrium dialysis.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The second category of free T models refutes the assumption that SHBG expresses linear binding kinetics and takes into account allosteric interaction between binding sites for T on the SHBG homodimer.
“A second category contests the principle of Scatchard analysis, refuting the assumption that SHBG expresses linear binding kinetics [213]. This model takes into account allosteric interaction between binding sites for T on the SHBG homodimer.”
From Role of sex hormone-binding globulin in the free hormone hypothesis and the relevance of free testosterone in androgen physiology (2022) · cites this paper as [213]
Free T algorithms can be divided into three categories: linear mass action, non-linear allosteric, and empirical bootstrap.
“A wide spectrum of algorithms for free T exists, which can broadly be divided into three categories (Table 6).”
From Role of sex hormone-binding globulin in the free hormone hypothesis and the relevance of free testosterone in androgen physiology (2022) · cites this paper as [213]
A more recent multi-step model estimating free testosterone using dichotomized analysis of SHBG reported estimates not statistically different from equilibrium dialysis.
“A more recent, multi-step model of estimating fT using a dichotomized analysis of SHBG reported estimates which were not statistically different from those obtained via equilibrium dialysis.”
From Challenges in Testosterone Measurement, Data Interpretation, and Methodological Appraisal of Interventional Trials (2016) · cites this paper as [108]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 53 · Cited by 81
- Authors
- Zakharov, M. N., Bhasin, S., Travison, T. G., Xue, R., Ulloor, J., Vasan, R. S., Carter, E., Wu, F., & Jasuja, R.
- Affiliations
- Boston University (US)
- Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Bhasin, Shalender
- Jasuja, Ravi
- ORCID
- Venue
- Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-01
- Volume
- 399
- Pages
- 190-200
- ISSN
- 0303-7207 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2125236816
- Cited by
- 81
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 6.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- erratum (2017-10-15)
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal and reproductive studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence Analysis
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
- Keywords
- testosterone, sex hormone-binding globulin, free testosterone, allosteric binding, binding isotherms, isothermal titration calorimetry, equilibrium dialysis, hypogonadism, luteinizing hormone
- MeSH terms
- Allosteric Regulation, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Chemical, Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin, Testosterone, Protein Multimerization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review