Cited by 34Nerve injury and regenerationNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsOlfactory and Sensory Function Studies

Differing phagocytic capacities of accessory and main olfactory ensheathing cells and the implication for olfactory glia transplantation therapies

Open access
Nazareth, Lynnmaria, Tello Velasquez, Johana, Lineburg, Katie E., Chehrehasa, Fatemeh, St John, James A., Ekberg, Jenny A.K.·2015·Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience

Abstract

The rodent olfactory systems comprise the main olfactory system for the detection of odours and the accessory olfactory system which detects pheromones. In both systems, olfactory axon fascicles are ensheathed by olfactory glia, termed olfactory ensheathing cells (OECs), which are crucial for the growth and maintenance of the olfactory nerve. The growth-promoting and phagocytic characteristics of OECs make them potential candidates for neural repair therapies such as transplantation to repair the injured spinal cord. However, transplanting mixed populations of glia with unknown properties may lead to variations in outcomes for neural repair. As the phagocytic capacity of the accessory OECs has not yet been determined, we compared the phagocytic capacity of accessory and main OECs in vivo and in vitro. In normal healthy animals, the accessory OECs accumulated considerably less axon debris than main OECs in vivo. Analysis of freshly dissected OECs showed that accessory OECs contained 20% less fluorescent axon debris than main OECs. However, when assayed in vitro with exogenous axon debris added to the culture, the accessory OECs phagocytosed almost 20% more debris than main OECs. After surgical removal of one olfactory bulb which induced the degradation of main and accessory olfactory sensory axons, the accessory OECs responded by phagocytosing the axon debris. We conclude that while accessory OECs have the capacity to phagocytose axon debris, there are distinct differences in their phagocytic capacity compared to main OECs. These distinct differences may be of importance when preparing OECs for neural transplant repair therapies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mcn.2015.03.005

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most microbes are likely eliminated by phagocytic glia, olfactory ensheathing cells (OECs) and trigeminal Schwann cells (TgSCs), should they penetrate the epithelium and reach the nerves.

    “Most microbes are, however, likely eliminated by phagocytic glia, olfactory ensheathing cells (OECs) and trigeminal Schwann cells (TgSCs), should they penetrate the epithelium and reach the nerves29–31.”

    From Chlamydia pneumoniae can infect the central nervous system via the olfactory and trigeminal nerves and contributes to Alzheimer’s disease risk (2022) · cites this paper as [30]

    The Discussion identifies OECs as the main phagocytic cells of olfactory nerves, but describes their removal of axon debris, not microbes. The paper mentions trigeminal Schwann cells as possible contaminants of OEC preparations; it does not establish that they phagocytose microbes or that these glia eliminate most microbes reaching the nerves. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Feron, F., Perry, C., Cochrane, J., Licina, P., Nowitzke, A., Urquhart, S., Geraghty, T., Mackay-Sim, A., 2005. Autologous olfactory ensheathing cell transplantation in human spinal cord injury. Brain : a journal of neurology 128, 2951-2960.
  2. Granger, N., Blamires, H., Franklin, R.J., Jeffery, N.D., 2012. Autologous olfactory mucosal cell transplants in clinical spinal cord injury: a randomized double-blinded trial in a canine translational model. Brain : a journal of neurology 135, 3227-3237.
  3. Toft, A., Scott, D.T., Barnett, S.C., Riddell, J.S., 2007. Electrophysiological evidence that olfactory cell transplants improve function after spinal cord injury. Brain : a journal of neurology 130, 970-984.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nazareth, L., Tello Velasquez, J., Lineburg, K. E., Chehrehasa, F., St John, J. A., & Ekberg, J. A. K.
Affiliations
  • QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute (AU)
  • Griffith University (AU)
Corresponding author
Ekberg, Jenny A.K.
Venue
Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-03
Volume
65
Pages
92-101
ISSN
1044-7431 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1948587042
Cited by
34
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2
FWCI
1.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Faculty of Health; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation
Funders
  • Griffith University
  • Australian Research Council (DP0986294)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
Keywords
olfactory ensheathing cells, accessory olfactory system, main olfactory system, phagocytosis, neural repair, olfactory bulb, axonal degeneration, pheromone detection
MeSH terms
Animals, Cells, Cultured, Neuroglia, Olfactory Nerve, Phagocytosis, Cell Transplantation, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review