Cited by 25Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsDevelopmental Biology and Gene Regulation

Fibulin-2 is a key mediator of the pro-neurogenic effect of TGF-beta1 on adult neural stem cells

Open access
Radice, Pablo Daniel, Mathieu, Patricia, Leal, María Celeste, Farías, María Isabel, Ferrari, Carina, Puntel, Mariana, Salibe, Mariano, Chernomoretz, Ariel +1 more·2015·Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience

Abstract

Transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-beta1), an anti-inflammatory cytokine, has been shown to have pro-neurogenic effects on adult Neural Stem Cells (aNSC) from the dentate gyrus and in vivo models. Here, we expanded the observation of the pro-neurogenic effect of TGF-beta1 on aNSC from the subventricular zone (SVZ) of adult rats and performed a functional genomic analysis to identify candidate genes to mediate its effect. 10 candidate genes were identified by microarray analysis and further validated by qRT-PCR. Of these, Fibulin-2 was increased 477-fold and its inhibition by siRNA blocks TGF-beta1 pro-neurogenic effect. Curiously, Fibulin-2 was not expressed by aNSC but by a GFAP-positive population in the culture, suggesting an indirect mechanism of action. TGF-beta1 also induced Fibulin-2 in the SVZ in vivo. Interestingly, 5 out of the 10 candidate genes identified are known to interact with integrins, paving the way for exploring their functional role in adult neurogenesis. In conclusion, we have identified 10 genes with putative pro-neurogenic effects, 5 of them related to integrins and provided proof that Fibulin-2 is a major mediator of the pro-neurogenic effects of TGF-beta1. These data should contribute to further exploring the molecular mechanism of adult neurogenesis of the genes identified and the involvement of the integrin pathway on adult neurogenesis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mcn.2015.06.004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 37 · Cited by 25

Authors
Radice, P. D., Mathieu, P., Leal, M. C., Farías, M. I., Ferrari, C., Puntel, M., Salibe, M., Chernomoretz, A., & Pitossi, F. J.
Affiliations
  • Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR)
  • Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires (AR)
Corresponding author
Pitossi, Fernando Juan
Venue
Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-07
Volume
67
Pages
75-83
ISSN
1044-7431 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W617921437
Cited by
25
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2
FWCI
0.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CONICET Digital (CONICET) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
ANPCyT
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
Keywords
fibulin-2, TGF-β1, adult neural stem cells, subventricular zone, adult neurogenesis, integrins, candidate gene identification, siRNA knockdown
MeSH terms
Animals, Astrocytes, Calcium-Binding Proteins, Cells, Cultured, Integrins, Extracellular Matrix Proteins, Rats, Wistar, Lateral Ventricles, Rats, Adult Stem Cells, Transforming Growth Factor beta1, Neurogenesis, Neural Stem Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review