The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Machinery fault diagnosis with imbalanced data using deep generative adversarial networks
Abstract
Abstract Despite the recent advances of intelligent data-driven fault diagnosis methods on rotating machines, balanced training data for different machine health conditions are assumed in most studies. However, the signals in machine faulty states are usually difficult and expensive to collect, resulting in imbalanced training dataset in most cases. That significantly deteriorates the effectiveness of the existing data-driven approaches. This paper proposes a deep learning-based fault diagnosis method to address the imbalanced data problem by explicitly creating additional training data. Generative adversarial networks are firstly used to learn the mapping between the distributions of noise and real machinery temporal vibration data, and additional realistic fake samples can be generated to balance and further expand the available dataset afterwards. Through experiments on two rotating machinery datasets, it is validated that the data-driven methods can significantly benefit from the data augmentation, and the proposed method offers a promising tool on fault diagnosis with imbalanced training data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SMOTE synthetic minority over-sampling technique
Chawla, N. V., Bowyer, K. W., Hall, L. O., & Kegelmeyer, W. P. (2002) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.953 · Cited by 32,865
Lei, Y., Jia, F., Lin, J., Xing, S., & Ding, S. X. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · doi:10.1109/tie.2016.2519325 · Cited by 1,191
Yang, B., Lei, Y., Jia, F., & Xing, S. (2019) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.12.051 · Cited by 879
Jia, F., Lei, Y., Lu, N., & Xing, S. (2018) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.03.025 · Cited by 587
Zhang, Y., Li, X., Gao, L., Wang, L., & Wen, L. (2018) · Journal of Manufacturing Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.04.005 · Cited by 226
Self-citation
Cited by
Zhao, Z., Li, T., Wu, J., Sun, C., Wang, S., Yan, R., & Chen, X. (2020) · ISA Transactions · doi:10.1016/j.isatra.2020.08.010 · Cited by 688
Xiang, L., Wang, P., Yang, X., Hu, A., & Su, H. (2021) · Measurement · doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2021.109094 · Cited by 406
Zhang, W., Li, X., Ma, H., Luo, Z., & Li, X. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2021.3054651 · Cited by 282
Self-citationUniversal Domain Adaptation in Fault Diagnostics With Hybrid Weighted Deep Adversarial Learning
Zhang, W., Li, X., Ma, H., Luo, Z., & Li, X. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2021.3064377 · Cited by 268
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, W., Li, X., Jia, X.-D., Ma, H., Luo, Z., & Li, X.
- Venue
- Measurement
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-02
- Volume
- 152
- Pages
- 107377
- ISSN
- 0263-2241 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2995758361
- Cited by
- 364
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 22.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Machinery fault diagnosis with imbalanced data using deep generative adversarial networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.measurement.2019.107377
- The paper
- Zhang, W., Li, X., Jia, X.-D., Ma, H., Luo, Z., & Li, X. (2020). Machinery fault diagnosis with imbalanced data using deep generative adversarial networks. Measurement. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2019.107377
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.