Antimicrobial effects of selected plant essential oils on the growth of a Pseudomonas putida strain isolated from meat
Abstract
The inhibitory effect of 60 different essential oils was evaluated on a Pseudomonas putida strain of meat origin, associated with meat spoilage. Essential oils were tested at concentrations from 0.003 to 0.8% (wt/vol) to determine minimum inhibitory and maximal tolerated concentrations (MIC and MTC, respectively) using an agar medium culture. Of the 60 samples tested, Corydothymus capitatus essential oil was the most active showing a MIC of 0.025% and a MTC of 0.06%. Seven essential oils (Cinnamomum cassia, Origanum compactum, Origanum heracleoticum, Satureja hortensis, Satureja montana, Thymus vulgaris carvacroliferum, Thymus vulgaris thymoliferum) have shown a strong antimicrobial activity against P. putida with a MIC of 0.05% and a MTC ranging from 0.013% to 0.025%. Ten other oils (Cinnamomum verum (leaf and bark), Eugenia caryophyllus, Cymbopogon martinii var. motia, Cymbopogon nardus, Melaleuca linariifolia, Origanum majorana, Pimenta dioica, Thymus satureoides, Thymus serpyllum) showed a high antimicrobial activity showing a MIC ranging from 0.1% to 0.4%, while the remaining were less active showing a MIC⩾0.8%.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Essential oils disrupt the cell membrane and alter the intracellular and external ATP balance such that ATP is lost through the disturbed membrane.
“EOs disrupt the cell membrane alter the intracellular and external ATP balance such that ATP is lost through the disturbed membrane [12,92,93].”
From Effect of essential oils on pathogenic bacteria (2013) · cites this paper as [92]
Spanish oregano, Chinese cinnamon and savoury oils caused morphological damage and disruption of the cell membrane in E. coli O157:H7 and L. monocytogenes.
“Oussalahet al. [92] observed morphological damage and a disruption of the cell membrane after treatment of E. coli O157:H7 and L. monocytogenes with Spanish oregano, Chinese cinnamon and savoury oils.”
From Effect of essential oils on pathogenic bacteria (2013) · cites this paper as [92]
E. coli cells had holes or white spots on the cell wall after treatment.
“In particular, the E. coli cells had holes or white spots on the cell wall.”
From Effect of essential oils on pathogenic bacteria (2013) · cites this paper as [92]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 54 · Cited by 307
- Authors
- Oussalah, M., Caillet, S., Saucier, L., & Lacroix, M.
- Affiliations
- Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique (CA)
- Université Laval (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Lacroix, Monique
- Venue
- Meat Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-06
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 236-244
- ISSN
- 0309-1740 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2010520488
- Cited by
- 307
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 10.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Meat Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Insect Pest Control Strategies
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Antimicrobial agents and applications
- Keywords
- plant essential oils, Pseudomonas putida, antimicrobial activity, meat spoilage, minimum inhibitory concentration, thyme, Cinnamomum cassia, Origanum, Satureja, Cymbopogon, Melaleuca, meat microbiology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review