Cited by 14Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Management and EducationDiabetes and associated disorders

Cambios glucémicos durante el ciclo menstrual en mujeres con diabetes mellitus tipo 1

Herranz, Lucrecia, Saez-de-Ibarra, Lourdes, Hillman, Natalia, Gaspar, Ruth, Pallardo, Luis Felipe·2016·Medicina Clínica

Abstract

Background and objective To determine frequency of women with type 1 diabetes showing menstrual cyclic changes in glycemia, analyze their clinical characteristics, and assess the pattern of glycemic changes. Patients and methods We analyzed glucose meter readings along 168 menstrual cycles of 26 women with type 1 diabetes. We evaluated mean glucose, mean glucose standard deviation, mean fasting glucose, percentage of glucose readings>7.8 mmol/L and Results A percentage of 65.4 of the women had cyclic changes. Characteristics of women with and without cyclic changes, including self-perception of glycemic changes, were similar with exception of age at diabetes diagnosis (22.5 [7.5] vs. 14.4 [9.5] years; P=.039). In women with cyclic changes mean percentage of glucose readings>7.8 mmol/L rose from early follicular (52.2 [16.3] %) to early and late luteal (58.4 [16.0] %, P=.0269; 61.0 [16.9] %, P=.000). Conclusion Almost two-thirds of women with type 1 diabetes experience a menstrual cycle phenomenon, attributable to an increase in hyperglycemic excursions during the luteal phase. Enabling women to evaluate their weekly mean glucose from their meter and exploring the causes of hyperglycemic excursions during luteal phase should ensure more accuracy when giving instructions for diabetes management in women with premenstrual hyperglycemia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.medcli.2015.11.044

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 17 · Cited by 14

Authors
Herranz, L., Saez-de-Ibarra, L., Hillman, N., Gaspar, R., & Pallardo, L. F.
Affiliations
Hospital Universitario La Paz (ES)
Corresponding author
Herranz, Lucrecia
Venue
Medicina Clínica
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-04
Volume
146
Issue
7
Pages
287-291
ISSN
0025-7753 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2279676534
Cited by
14
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.67
Type
journal article
Language
es
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medicina Clínica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
Keywords
type 1 diabetes, menstrual cycle, luteal phase, follicular phase, glycemic variability, continuous glucose monitoring, insulin dose, glycemic control, diabetes self-management education, age at diabetes diagnosis
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Menstrual Cycle, Retrospective Studies, Biomarkers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review