Cambios glucémicos durante el ciclo menstrual en mujeres con diabetes mellitus tipo 1
Abstract
Background and objective To determine frequency of women with type 1 diabetes showing menstrual cyclic changes in glycemia, analyze their clinical characteristics, and assess the pattern of glycemic changes. Patients and methods We analyzed glucose meter readings along 168 menstrual cycles of 26 women with type 1 diabetes. We evaluated mean glucose, mean glucose standard deviation, mean fasting glucose, percentage of glucose readings>7.8 mmol/L and Results A percentage of 65.4 of the women had cyclic changes. Characteristics of women with and without cyclic changes, including self-perception of glycemic changes, were similar with exception of age at diabetes diagnosis (22.5 [7.5] vs. 14.4 [9.5] years; P=.039). In women with cyclic changes mean percentage of glucose readings>7.8 mmol/L rose from early follicular (52.2 [16.3] %) to early and late luteal (58.4 [16.0] %, P=.0269; 61.0 [16.9] %, P=.000). Conclusion Almost two-thirds of women with type 1 diabetes experience a menstrual cycle phenomenon, attributable to an increase in hyperglycemic excursions during the luteal phase. Enabling women to evaluate their weekly mean glucose from their meter and exploring the causes of hyperglycemic excursions during luteal phase should ensure more accuracy when giving instructions for diabetes management in women with premenstrual hyperglycemia.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Our findings are consistent with previous studies on women with T1D treated with MDI or CSII, which consistently reported reduced insulin sensitivity and deterioration of glycemic control during the luteal phase.
“Our findings are consistent with those of previous studies on women with T1D treated with multiple daily injections (MDI) or continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII), which consistently reported reduced insulin sensitivity and deterioration of glycemic control during the luteal phase 4 , 5 , 16 .”
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 17 · Cited by 14
- Authors
- Herranz, L., Saez-de-Ibarra, L., Hillman, N., Gaspar, R., & Pallardo, L. F.
- Affiliations
- Hospital Universitario La Paz (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Herranz, Lucrecia
- ORCID
- Hillman, Natalia
- Venue
- Medicina Clínica
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-04
- Volume
- 146
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 287-291
- ISSN
- 0025-7753 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2279676534
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 0.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- es
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Medicina Clínica (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
- Keywords
- type 1 diabetes, menstrual cycle, luteal phase, follicular phase, glycemic variability, continuous glucose monitoring, insulin dose, glycemic control, diabetes self-management education, age at diabetes diagnosis
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Menstrual Cycle, Retrospective Studies, Biomarkers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review