Ensemble of expert deep neural networks for spatio-temporal denoising of contrast-enhanced MRI sequences
Abstract
Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) is an imaging protocol where MRI scans are acquired repetitively throughout the injection of a contrast agent. The analysis of dynamic scans is widely used for the detection and quantification of blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability. Extraction of the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters from the DCE-MRI concentration curves allows quantitative assessment of the integrity of the BBB functionality. However, curve fitting required for the analysis of DCE-MRI data is error-prone as the dynamic scans are subject to non-white, spatially-dependent and anisotropic noise. We present a novel spatio-temporal framework based on Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) to address the DCE-MRI denoising challenges. This is accomplished by an ensemble of expert DNNs constructed as deep autoencoders, where each is trained on a specific subset of the input space to accommodate different noise characteristics and curve prototypes. Spatial dependencies of the PK dynamics are captured by incorporating the curves of neighboring voxels in the entire process. The most likely reconstructed curves are then chosen using a classifier DNN followed by a quadratic programming optimization. As clean signals (ground-truth) for training are not available, a fully automatic model for generating realistic training sets with complex nonlinear dynamics is introduced. The proposed approach has been successfully applied to full and even temporally down-sampled DCE-MRI sequences, from two different databases, of stroke and brain tumor patients, and is shown to favorably compare to state-of-the-art denoising methods.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Benou et al.'s ensemble model's qualitative and quantitative (MSE) denoising results were better than spatiotemporal Beltrami, moving average, the dynamic Non Local Means method, and stacked denoising autoencoders.
“The qualitative and quantitative (MSE) denoising results were better than spatiotemporal Beltrami, moving average, the dynamic Non Local Means method [182], and stacked denoising autoencoders [183].”
From An overview of deep learning in medical imaging focusing on MRI (2019) · cites this paper as [181]
Deep learning approaches have been introduced to denoising.
“Recently, deep learning approaches have been introduced to denoising.”
From An overview of deep learning in medical imaging focusing on MRI (2019) · cites this paper as [181]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 63 · Cited by 91
- Authors
- Benou, A., Veksler, R., Friedman, A., & Riklin Raviv, T.
- Affiliations
- Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL)
- ORCID
- Friedman, A.
- Venue
- Medical Image Analysis
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-12
- Volume
- 42
- Pages
- 145-159
- ISSN
- 1361-8415 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2741247953
- Cited by
- 91
- References
- 63
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 9
- FWCI
- 4.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Medical Image Analysis (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Seventh Framework Program (FP7/2007–2013)
- Israel Science Foundation (717/15 A.F. and 1638/16 T.R.R)
- BSF (2015363)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Signal Denoising Methods
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › MRI in cancer diagnosis
- Keywords
- dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, blood-brain barrier permeability, pharmacokinetic parameter estimation, deep autoencoder, anisotropic noise, synthetic training data generation, stroke, brain tumors
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Blood-Brain Barrier, Brain Mapping, Contrast Media, Humans, Image Enhancement, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Neural Networks, Computer, Anisotropy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review