Cited by 91Image and Signal Denoising MethodsAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsMRI in cancer diagnosis

Ensemble of expert deep neural networks for spatio-temporal denoising of contrast-enhanced MRI sequences

Benou, A., Veksler, R., Friedman, A., Riklin Raviv, T.·2017·Medical Image Analysis

Abstract

Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) is an imaging protocol where MRI scans are acquired repetitively throughout the injection of a contrast agent. The analysis of dynamic scans is widely used for the detection and quantification of blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability. Extraction of the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters from the DCE-MRI concentration curves allows quantitative assessment of the integrity of the BBB functionality. However, curve fitting required for the analysis of DCE-MRI data is error-prone as the dynamic scans are subject to non-white, spatially-dependent and anisotropic noise. We present a novel spatio-temporal framework based on Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) to address the DCE-MRI denoising challenges. This is accomplished by an ensemble of expert DNNs constructed as deep autoencoders, where each is trained on a specific subset of the input space to accommodate different noise characteristics and curve prototypes. Spatial dependencies of the PK dynamics are captured by incorporating the curves of neighboring voxels in the entire process. The most likely reconstructed curves are then chosen using a classifier DNN followed by a quadratic programming optimization. As clean signals (ground-truth) for training are not available, a fully automatic model for generating realistic training sets with complex nonlinear dynamics is introduced. The proposed approach has been successfully applied to full and even temporally down-sampled DCE-MRI sequences, from two different databases, of stroke and brain tumor patients, and is shown to favorably compare to state-of-the-art denoising methods.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.media.2017.07.006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Benou et al.'s ensemble model's qualitative and quantitative (MSE) denoising results were better than spatiotemporal Beltrami, moving average, the dynamic Non Local Means method, and stacked denoising autoencoders.

    “The qualitative and quantitative (MSE) denoising results were better than spatiotemporal Beltrami, moving average, the dynamic Non Local Means method [182], and stacked denoising autoencoders [183].”
  • Deep learning approaches have been introduced to denoising.

    “Recently, deep learning approaches have been introduced to denoising.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 63 · Cited by 91

Authors
Benou, A., Veksler, R., Friedman, A., & Riklin Raviv, T.
Affiliations
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL)
Venue
Medical Image Analysis
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-12
Volume
42
Pages
145-159
ISSN
1361-8415 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2741247953
Cited by
91
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 9
FWCI
4.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Image Analysis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Seventh Framework Program (FP7/2007–2013)
  • Israel Science Foundation (717/15 A.F. and 1638/16 T.R.R)
  • BSF (2015363)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Signal Denoising Methods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › MRI in cancer diagnosis
Keywords
dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, blood-brain barrier permeability, pharmacokinetic parameter estimation, deep autoencoder, anisotropic noise, synthetic training data generation, stroke, brain tumors
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Blood-Brain Barrier, Brain Mapping, Contrast Media, Humans, Image Enhancement, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Neural Networks, Computer, Anisotropy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review