Conversion and time-to-conversion predictions of mild cognitive impairment using low-rank affinity pursuit denoising and matrix completion
Open accessAbstract
In this paper, we aim to predict conversion and time-to-conversion of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) patients using multi-modal neuroimaging data and clinical data, via cross-sectional and longitudinal studies. However, such data are often heterogeneous, high-dimensional, noisy, and incomplete. We thus propose a framework that includes sparse feature selection, low-rank affinity pursuit denoising (LRAD), and low-rank matrix completion (LRMC) in this study. Specifically, we first use sparse linear regressions to remove unrelated features. Then, considering the heterogeneity of the MCI data, which can be assumed as a union of multiple subspaces, we propose to use a low rank subspace method (i.e., LRAD) to denoise the data. Finally, we employ LRMC algorithm with three data fitting terms and one inequality constraint for joint conversion and time-to-conversion predictions. Our framework aims to answer a very important but yet rarely explored question in AD study, i.e., when will the MCI convert to AD? This is different from survival analysis, which provides the probabilities of conversion at different time points that are mainly used for global analysis, while our time-to-conversion prediction is for each individual subject. Evaluations using the ADNI dataset indicate that our method outperforms conventional LRMC and other state-of-the-art methods. Our method achieves a maximal pMCI classification accuracy of 84% and time prediction correlation of 0.665.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Longitudinal-data classifiers outperform cross-sectional-data classifiers in classification performance.
“Informed by pattern classification studies which have demonstrated that pattern classifiers built on longitudinal data could achieve better classification performance than those built on cross-sectional data”
Prior work has modeled time-to-AD-progression in a survival framework and obtained encouraging results.
“Several studies [11, 12, 16] have focused on the prediction of time of progression to AD under a time-to-event analysis setting, and promising performance have been obtained.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 106 · Cited by 89
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Miller RG Jr, 2011 Survival Analysis, 66 John Wiley & Sons.
- Rasmussen CE, Williams CK, 2006 Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning, 1 MIT press Cambridge.
- Authors
- Thung, K.-H., Yap, P.-T., Adeli, E., Lee, S.-W., & Shen, D.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Korea University (KR)
- Corresponding author
- Shen, Dinggang
- Venue
- Medical Image Analysis
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-04
- Volume
- 45
- Pages
- 68-82
- ISSN
- 1361-8415 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6892173
- OpenAlex
- W2792608425
- Cited by
- 89
- References
- 106
- Citations by year
- 2025: 5 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5
- FWCI
- 6.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Medical Image Analysis (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
- UNC Libraries
- Funders
- Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea
- National Institutes of Health
- Institute for Information and Communications Technology Promotion (2017-0-00451, No. 2017-0-00451)
- National Institute on Aging (RF1AG053867, R01AG042599, R01AG041721)
- National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R01EB022880, R01EB008374)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Keywords
- mild cognitive impairment, conversion to Alzheimer's disease, low-rank matrix completion, sparse feature selection, multimodal neuroimaging, longitudinal data, ADNI, personalized prediction
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Longitudinal Studies, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Radiopharmaceuticals, Fluorodeoxyglucose F18, Positron-Emission Tomography, Neuroimaging, Cognitive Dysfunction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review