The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Weakly supervised mitosis detection in breast histopathology images using concentric loss
Abstract
HighlightsAn automatic and accurate system for detecting mitosis in histopathology images.Our method utilizes a deep segmentation network to produce segmentation map. Then a filtering operation is applied to produce the detection results.A novel concentric loss function is proposed to train the semantic segmentation network on weakly supervised mitosis data.We validate our detection system on four widely used mitosis detection datasets and achieve the best performances on three challenging datasets. Graphical abstract Figure. No Caption available. ABSTRACT Developing new deep learning methods for medical image analysis is a prevalent research topic in machine learning. In this paper, we propose a deep learning scheme with a novel loss function for weakly supervised breast cancer diagnosis. According to the Nottingham Grading System, mitotic count plays an important role in breast cancer diagnosis and grading. To determine the cancer grade, pathologists usually need to manually count mitosis from a great deal of histopathology images, which is a very tedious and time‐consuming task. This paper proposes an automatic method for detecting mitosis. We regard the mitosis detection task as a semantic segmentation problem and use a deep fully convolutional network to address it. Different from conventional training data used in semantic segmentation system, the training label of mitosis data is usually in the format of centroid pixel, rather than all the pixels belonging to a mitosis. The centroid label is a kind of weak label, which is much easier to annotate and can save the effort of pathologists a lot. However, technically this weak label is not sufficient for training a mitosis segmentation model. To tackle this problem, we expand the single‐pixel label to a novel label with concentric circles, where the inside circle is a mitotic region and the ring around the inside circle is a “middle ground”. During the training stage, we do not compute the loss of the ring region because it may have the presence of both mitotic and non‐mitotic pixels. This new loss termed as “concentric loss” is able to make the semantic segmentation network be trained with the weakly annotated mitosis data. On the generated segmentation map from the segmentation model, we filter out low confidence and obtain mitotic cells. On the challenging ICPR 2014 MITOSIS dataset and AMIDA13 dataset, we achieve a 0.562 F‐score and 0.673 F‐score respectively, outperforming all previous approaches significantly. On the latest TUPAC16 dataset, we obtain a F‐score of 0.669, which is also the state‐of‐the‐art result. The excellent results quantitatively demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed mitosis segmentation network with the concentric loss. All of our code has been made publicly available at https://github.com/ChaoLi977/SegMitos_mitosis_detection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00994018 · Cited by 59,421
Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition
Lecun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., & Haffner, P. (1998) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.726791 · Cited by 58,805
A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting
Freund, Y., & Schapire, R. E. (1997) · Journal of Computer and System Sciences · doi:10.1006/jcss.1997.1504 · Cited by 20,466
Convolutional Neural Networks for Medical Image Analysis: Full Training or Fine Tuning?
Tajbakhsh, N., Shin, J. Y., Gurudu, S. R., Hurst, R. T., Kendall, C. B., Gotway, M. B., & Liang, J. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2016.2535302 · Cited by 3,277
Holistically-nested edge detection
Xie, S., & Tu, Z. (2017) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-017-1004-z · Cited by 682
AggNet: Deep Learning From Crowds for Mitosis Detection in Breast Cancer Histology Images
Albarqouni, S., Baur, C., Achilles, F., Belagiannis, V., Demirci, S., & Navab, N. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2016.2528120 · Cited by 606
PCL: Proposal Cluster Learning for Weakly Supervised Object Detection
Tang, P., Wang, X., Bai, S., Shen, W., Bai, X., Liu, W., & Yuille, A. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2018.2876304 · Cited by 406
Self-citation
Cited by
Deep learning in histopathology: the path to the clinic
van der Laak, J., Litjens, G., & Ciompi, F. (2021) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-021-01343-4 · Cited by 902
Deep neural network models for computational histopathology: A survey
Srinidhi, C. L., Ciga, O., & Martel, A. L. (2021) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2020.101813 · Cited by 749
Abels, E., Pantanowitz, L., Aeffner, F., Zarella, M. D., van der Laak, J., Bui, M. M., Vemuri, V. N., Parwani, A. V., Gibbs, J., Agosto‐Arroyo, E., et al. (2019) · The Journal of Pathology · doi:10.1002/path.5331 · Cited by 459
Salvi, M., Acharya, U. R., Molinari, F., & Meiburger, K. M. (2021) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.104129 · Cited by 386
Robust application of new deep learning tools: an experimental study in medical imaging
Alzubaidi, L., Fadhel, M. A., Al-Shamma, O., Zhang, J., Santamaría, J., & Duan, Y. (2022) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-021-10942-9 · Cited by 68
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, C., Wang, X., Liu, W., Latecki, L. J., Wang, B., & Huang, J.
- Venue
- Medical Image Analysis
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-04
- Volume
- 53
- Pages
- 165-178
- ISSN
- 1361-8415 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2913510405
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 9.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Weakly supervised mitosis detection in breast histopathology images using concentric loss. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.media.2019.01.013
- The paper
- Li, C., Wang, X., Liu, W., Latecki, L. J., Wang, B., & Huang, J. (2019). Weakly supervised mitosis detection in breast histopathology images using concentric loss. Medical Image Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2019.01.013
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.