Cited by 116AI in cancer detectionDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Self-supervised driven consistency training for annotation efficient histopathology image analysis

Open access
Srinidhi, Chetan L., Kim, Seung Wook, Chen, Fu-Der, Martel, Anne L.·2022·Medical Image Analysis

Abstract

Training a neural network with a large labeled dataset is still a dominant paradigm in computational histopathology. However, obtaining such exhaustive manual annotations is often expensive, laborious, and prone to inter and intra-observer variability. While recent self-supervised and semi-supervised methods can alleviate this need by learning unsupervised feature representations, they still struggle to generalize well to downstream tasks when the number of labeled instances is small. In this work, we overcome this challenge by leveraging both task-agnostic and task-specific unlabeled data based on two novel strategies: (i) a self-supervised pretext task that harnesses the underlying multi-resolution contextual cues in histology whole-slide images to learn a powerful supervisory signal for unsupervised representation learning; (ii) a new teacher-student semi-supervised consistency paradigm that learns to effectively transfer the pretrained representations to downstream tasks based on prediction consistency with the task-specific unlabeled data. We carry out extensive validation experiments on three histopathology benchmark datasets across two classification and one regression based tasks, i.e., tumor metastasis detection, tissue type classification, and tumor cellularity quantification. Under limited-label data, the proposed method yields tangible improvements, which is close to or even outperforming other state-of-the-art self-supervised and supervised baselines. Furthermore, we empirically show that the idea of bootstrapping the self-supervised pretrained features is an effective way to improve the task-specific semi-supervised learning on standard benchmarks. Code and pretrained models are made available at: https://github.com/srinidhiPY/SSL_CR_Histo.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.media.2021.102256

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 51 references

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Chaitanya, K., Erdil, E., Karani, N., Konukoglu, E., 2020. Contrastive learning of global and local features for medical image segmentation with limited annotations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.10511. · arXiv
  2. Hinton, G., Vinyals, O., Dean, J., 2015. Distilling the knowledge in a neural network. arXiv preprint arXiv:1503.02531. · arXiv
  3. Kim, J., Hur, Y., Park, S., Yang, E., Hwang, S. J., Shin, J., 2020. Distribution aligning refinery of pseudo-label for imbalanced semi-supervised learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.08844. · arXiv
  4. Kingma, D. P., Welling, M., 2013. Auto-encoding variational bayes. arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.6114. · arXiv
  5. Laine, S., Aila, T., 2016. Temporal ensembling for semi-supervised learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.02242. · arXiv
  6. Martel, A. L., Nofech-Mozes, S., Salama, S., Akbar, S., Peikari, M., 2019. Assessment of residual breast cancer cellularity after neoadjuvant chemotherapy using digital pathology [data set]. 10.7937/TCIA.2019.4YIBTJNO. · DOI
  7. Oord, A. v. d., Li, Y., Vinyals, O., 2018. Representation learning with contrastive predictive coding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.03748. · arXiv
  8. Purushwalkam, S., Gupta, A., 2020. Demystifying contrastive self-supervised learning: invariances, augmentations and dataset biases. arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.13916. · arXiv
  9. Quiros, A. C., Murray-Smith, R., Yuan, K., 2019. Pathology GAN: learning deep representations of cancer tissue. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.02644. · arXiv
  10. Sohn, K., Berthelot, D., Li, C.-L., Zhang, Z., Carlini, N., Cubuk, E. D., Kurakin, A., Zhang, H., Raffel, C., 2020. Fixmatch: simplifying semi-supervised learning with consistency and confidence. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.07685. · arXiv
  11. Wang, D., Khosla, A., Gargeya, R., Irshad, H., Beck, A. H., 2016. Deep learning for identifying metastatic breast cancer. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.05718. · arXiv
  12. Xiao, T., Wang, X., Efros, A. A., Darrell, T., 2020. What should not be contrastive in contrastive learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.05659. · arXiv
  13. Xie, Q., Dai, Z., Hovy, E., Luong, M.-T., Le, Q. V., 2019. Unsupervised data augmentation for consistency training. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.12848. · arXiv
  14. Zoph, B., Ghiasi, G., Lin, T.-Y., Cui, Y., Liu, H., Cubuk, E. D., Le, Q. V., 2020. Rethinking pre-training and self-training. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.06882. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–116 of 116

Metadata

Authors
Srinidhi, C. L., Kim, S. W., Chen, F.-D., & Martel, A. L.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Srinidhi, Chetan L.
Venue
Medical Image Analysis
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-01
Volume
75
Pages
102256
ISSN
1361-8415 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3128158496
Cited by
116
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 18
FWCI
7.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Medical Image Analysis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • Canadian Cancer Society (705772)
  • Compute Canada
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Keywords
self-supervised learning, consistency regularization, teacher-student learning, semi-supervised learning, histopathology image analysis, whole slide images, limited labeled data, unsupervised feature learning, tumor metastasis detection, tissue classification, annotation efficiency
MeSH terms
Supervised Machine Learning, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Neural Networks, Computer, Benchmarking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review