The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Medical SAM adapter: Adapting segment anything model for medical image segmentation
Open accessAbstract
The Segment Anything Model (SAM) has recently gained popularity in the field of image segmentation due to its impressive capabilities in various segmentation tasks and its prompt-based interface. However, recent studies and individual experiments have shown that SAM underperforms in medical image segmentation due to the lack of medical-specific knowledge. This raises the question of how to enhance SAM's segmentation capability for medical images. We propose the Medical SAM Adapter (Med-SA), which is one of the first methods to integrate SAM into medical image segmentation. Med-SA uses a light yet effective adaptation technique instead of fine-tuning the SAM model, incorporating domain-specific medical knowledge into the segmentation model. We also propose Space-Depth Transpose (SD-Trans) to adapt 2D SAM to 3D medical images and Hyper-Prompting Adapter (HyP-Adpt) to achieve prompt-conditioned adaptation. Comprehensive evaluation experiments on 17 medical image segmentation tasks across various modalities demonstrate the superior performance of Med-SA while updating only 2% of the SAM parameters (13M). Our code is released at https://github.com/KidsWithTokens/Medical-SAM-Adapter.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Exploiting Generative AI to Scale up Intelligent Tutoring Systems
Jakubův, J., Chvalovský, K., Goertzel, Z., Kaliszyk, C., Olšák, M., Piotrowski, B., Schulz, S., Suda, M., & Urban, J. (2023) · DROPS (Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz Center for Informatics) · doi:10.4230/lipics.itp.2023.19 · Cited by 76,658
An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale
Dosovitskiy, A., Beyer, L., Kolesnikov, A., Weissenborn, D., Zhai, X., Unterthiner, T., Dehghani, M., Minderer, M., Heigold, G., Gelly, S., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.11929 · Cited by 47,472
LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models
Hu, E. J., Shen, Y., Wallis, P., Allen-Zhu, Z., Li, Y., Wang, S., Wang, L., & Chen, W. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.09685 · Cited by 13,453
nnU-Net: a self-configuring method for deep learning-based biomedical image segmentation
Isensee, F., Jaeger, P. F., Kohl, S. A. A., Petersen, J., & Maier-Hein, K. H. (2021) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-020-01008-z · Cited by 10,477
UNet++: A Nested U-Net Architecture for Medical Image Segmentation
Zhou, Z., Rahman Siddiquee, M. M., Tajbakhsh, N., & Liang, J. (2018) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-00889-5_1 · Cited by 9,610
Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models
Ho, J., Jain, A., & Abbeel, P. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.11239 · Cited by 8,712
3D U-Net: Learning Dense Volumetric Segmentation from Sparse Annotation
Çiçek, Ö., Abdulkadir, A., Lienkamp, S. S., Brox, T., & Ronneberger, O. (2016) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46723-8_49 · Cited by 7,945
TransUNet: Transformers Make Strong Encoders for Medical Image Segmentation
Chen, J., Lu, Y., Yu, Q., Luo, X., Adeli, E., Wang, Y., Lu, L., Yuille, A. L., & Zhou, Y. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2102.04306 · Cited by 4,206
QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMs
Dettmers, T., Pagnoni, A., Holtzman, A., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.14314 · Cited by 3,832
UNETR: Transformers for 3D Medical Image Segmentation
Hatamizadeh, A., Tang, Y., Nath, V., Yang, D., Myronenko, A., Landman, B., Roth, H., & Xu, D. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.10504 · Cited by 3,580
Cited by
Segment anything model for medical images?
Huang, Y., Yang, X., Liu, L., Zhou, H., Chang, A., Zhou, X., Chen, R., Yu, J., Chen, J., Chen, C., et al. (2024) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2023.103061 · Cited by 536
Foundation Models Defining a New Era in Vision: A Survey and Outlook
Awais, M., Naseer, M., Khan, S., Anwer, R. M., Cholakkal, H., Shah, M., Yang, M.-H., & Khan, F. S. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2024.3506283 · Cited by 304
3DSAM-adapter: Holistic adaptation of SAM from 2D to 3D for promptable tumor segmentation
Gong, S., Zhong, Y., Ma, W., Li, J., Wang, Z., Zhang, J., Heng, P.-A., & Dou, Q. (2024) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2024.103324 · Cited by 156
Self-citationFederated learning for healthcare applications
Chaddad, A., Wu, Y., & Desrosiers, C. (2024) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2023.3325822 · Cited by 136
Promise: Prompt-Driven 3D Medical Image Segmentation Using Pretrained Image Foundation Models
Li, H., Liu, H., Hu, D., Wang, J., & Oguz, I. (2024) · 2024 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) · doi:10.1109/isbi56570.2024.10635207 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Wu, J., Wang, Z., Hong, M., Ji, W., Fu, H., Xu, Y., Xu, M., & Jin, Y.
- Venue
- Medical Image Analysis
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2025-05
- Volume
- 102
- Pages
- 103547
- ISSN
- 1361-8415 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4408634392
- Cited by
- 677
- References
- 62
- FWCI
- 196.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Medical SAM adapter: Adapting segment anything model for medical image segmentation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.media.2025.103547
- The paper
- Wu, J., Wang, Z., Hong, M., Ji, W., Fu, H., Xu, Y., Xu, M., & Jin, Y. (2025). Medical SAM adapter: Adapting segment anything model for medical image segmentation. Medical Image Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2025.103547
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
